Commit 492c826b authored by Mark Brown's avatar Mark Brown Committed by Liam Girdwood

regulator: Remove supply_regulator_dev from machine configuration

supply_regulator_dev (using a struct pointer) has been deprecated in favour
of supply_regulator (using a regulator name) for quite a few releases
now with a warning generated if it is used and there are no current in tree
users so just remove the code.
Signed-off-by: default avatarMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLiam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
parent ba413c59
...@@ -53,11 +53,11 @@ static struct regulator_init_data regulator1_data = { ...@@ -53,11 +53,11 @@ static struct regulator_init_data regulator1_data = {
Regulator-1 supplies power to Regulator-2. This relationship must be registered Regulator-1 supplies power to Regulator-2. This relationship must be registered
with the core so that Regulator-1 is also enabled when Consumer A enables its with the core so that Regulator-1 is also enabled when Consumer A enables its
supply (Regulator-2). The supply regulator is set by the supply_regulator_dev supply (Regulator-2). The supply regulator is set by the supply_regulator
field below:- field below:-
static struct regulator_init_data regulator2_data = { static struct regulator_init_data regulator2_data = {
.supply_regulator_dev = &platform_regulator1_device.dev, .supply_regulator = "regulator_name",
.constraints = { .constraints = {
.min_uV = 1800000, .min_uV = 1800000,
.max_uV = 2000000, .max_uV = 2000000,
......
...@@ -2596,14 +2596,6 @@ struct regulator_dev *regulator_register(struct regulator_desc *regulator_desc, ...@@ -2596,14 +2596,6 @@ struct regulator_dev *regulator_register(struct regulator_desc *regulator_desc,
if (ret < 0) if (ret < 0)
goto scrub; goto scrub;
/* set supply regulator if it exists */
if (init_data->supply_regulator && init_data->supply_regulator_dev) {
dev_err(dev,
"Supply regulator specified by both name and dev\n");
ret = -EINVAL;
goto scrub;
}
if (init_data->supply_regulator) { if (init_data->supply_regulator) {
struct regulator_dev *r; struct regulator_dev *r;
int found = 0; int found = 0;
...@@ -2628,14 +2620,6 @@ struct regulator_dev *regulator_register(struct regulator_desc *regulator_desc, ...@@ -2628,14 +2620,6 @@ struct regulator_dev *regulator_register(struct regulator_desc *regulator_desc,
goto scrub; goto scrub;
} }
if (init_data->supply_regulator_dev) {
dev_warn(dev, "Uses supply_regulator_dev instead of regulator_supply\n");
ret = set_supply(rdev,
dev_get_drvdata(init_data->supply_regulator_dev));
if (ret < 0)
goto scrub;
}
/* add consumers devices */ /* add consumers devices */
for (i = 0; i < init_data->num_consumer_supplies; i++) { for (i = 0; i < init_data->num_consumer_supplies; i++) {
ret = set_consumer_device_supply(rdev, ret = set_consumer_device_supply(rdev,
......
...@@ -160,8 +160,6 @@ struct regulator_consumer_supply { ...@@ -160,8 +160,6 @@ struct regulator_consumer_supply {
* @supply_regulator: Parent regulator. Specified using the regulator name * @supply_regulator: Parent regulator. Specified using the regulator name
* as it appears in the name field in sysfs, which can * as it appears in the name field in sysfs, which can
* be explicitly set using the constraints field 'name'. * be explicitly set using the constraints field 'name'.
* @supply_regulator_dev: Parent regulator (if any) - DEPRECATED in favour
* of supply_regulator.
* *
* @constraints: Constraints. These must be specified for the regulator to * @constraints: Constraints. These must be specified for the regulator to
* be usable. * be usable.
...@@ -173,7 +171,6 @@ struct regulator_consumer_supply { ...@@ -173,7 +171,6 @@ struct regulator_consumer_supply {
*/ */
struct regulator_init_data { struct regulator_init_data {
const char *supply_regulator; /* or NULL for system supply */ const char *supply_regulator; /* or NULL for system supply */
struct device *supply_regulator_dev; /* or NULL for system supply */
struct regulation_constraints constraints; struct regulation_constraints constraints;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment