drm/amd/pm: correct table_clk_vlt memory size due to replacing one-element...

drm/amd/pm: correct table_clk_vlt memory size due to replacing one-element array with flexible-array in struct phm_clock_voltage_dependency_table

Add 1 to the size passed to kzalloc after replacing one-element array.

There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having
a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code
should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older
style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].

Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in
struct phm_ppt_v1_mm_clock_voltage_dependency_table, instead of a
one-element array, and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the
size for the allocation.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arraysSigned-off-by: Mengbing Wang <mengbing.wang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/powerplay/hwmgr/smu10_hwmgr.c

@@ -130,9 +130,10 @@ static int smu10_construct_max_power_limits_table(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr,
 static int smu10_init_dynamic_state_adjustment_rule_settings(
 							struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr)
 {
+	int count = 8;
 	struct phm_clock_voltage_dependency_table *table_clk_vlt;
 
-	table_clk_vlt = kzalloc(struct_size(table_clk_vlt, entries, 7),
+	table_clk_vlt = kzalloc(struct_size(table_clk_vlt, entries, count),
 				GFP_KERNEL);
 
 	if (NULL == table_clk_vlt) {
@@ -140,7 +141,7 @@ static int smu10_init_dynamic_state_adjustment_rule_settings(
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	}
 
-	table_clk_vlt->count = 8;
+	table_clk_vlt->count = count;
 	table_clk_vlt->entries[0].clk = PP_DAL_POWERLEVEL_0;
 	table_clk_vlt->entries[0].v = 0;
 	table_clk_vlt->entries[1].clk = PP_DAL_POWERLEVEL_1;