Commit 50718b8d authored by Dave Chinner's avatar Dave Chinner Committed by Darrick J. Wong

xfs: remove SYNC_TRYLOCK from inode reclaim

All background reclaim is SYNC_TRYLOCK already, and even blocking
reclaim (SYNC_WAIT) can use trylock mechanisms as
xfs_reclaim_inodes_ag() will keep cycling until there are no more
reclaimable inodes. Hence we can kill SYNC_TRYLOCK from inode
reclaim and make everything unconditionally non-blocking.

We remove all the optimistic "avoid blocking on locks" checks done
in xfs_reclaim_inode_grab() as nothing blocks on locks anymore.
Further, checking XFS_IFLOCK optimistically can result in detecting
inodes in the process of being cleaned (i.e. between being removed
from the AIL and having the flush lock dropped), so for
xfs_reclaim_inodes() to reliably reclaim all inodes we need to drop
these checks anyway.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarBrian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
parent 9552e14d
......@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ xfs_reclaim_worker(
struct xfs_mount *mp = container_of(to_delayed_work(work),
struct xfs_mount, m_reclaim_work);
xfs_reclaim_inodes(mp, SYNC_TRYLOCK);
xfs_reclaim_inodes(mp, 0);
xfs_reclaim_work_queue(mp);
}
......@@ -1028,48 +1028,37 @@ xfs_cowblocks_worker(
/*
* Grab the inode for reclaim exclusively.
* Return 0 if we grabbed it, non-zero otherwise.
*
* We have found this inode via a lookup under RCU, so the inode may have
* already been freed, or it may be in the process of being recycled by
* xfs_iget(). In both cases, the inode will have XFS_IRECLAIM set. If the inode
* has been fully recycled by the time we get the i_flags_lock, XFS_IRECLAIMABLE
* will not be set. Hence we need to check for both these flag conditions to
* avoid inodes that are no longer reclaim candidates.
*
* Note: checking for other state flags here, under the i_flags_lock or not, is
* racy and should be avoided. Those races should be resolved only after we have
* ensured that we are able to reclaim this inode and the world can see that we
* are going to reclaim it.
*
* Return true if we grabbed it, false otherwise.
*/
STATIC int
static bool
xfs_reclaim_inode_grab(
struct xfs_inode *ip,
int flags)
struct xfs_inode *ip)
{
ASSERT(rcu_read_lock_held());
/* quick check for stale RCU freed inode */
if (!ip->i_ino)
return 1;
/*
* If we are asked for non-blocking operation, do unlocked checks to
* see if the inode already is being flushed or in reclaim to avoid
* lock traffic.
*/
if ((flags & SYNC_TRYLOCK) &&
__xfs_iflags_test(ip, XFS_IFLOCK | XFS_IRECLAIM))
return 1;
/*
* The radix tree lock here protects a thread in xfs_iget from racing
* with us starting reclaim on the inode. Once we have the
* XFS_IRECLAIM flag set it will not touch us.
*
* Due to RCU lookup, we may find inodes that have been freed and only
* have XFS_IRECLAIM set. Indeed, we may see reallocated inodes that
* aren't candidates for reclaim at all, so we must check the
* XFS_IRECLAIMABLE is set first before proceeding to reclaim.
*/
spin_lock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
if (!__xfs_iflags_test(ip, XFS_IRECLAIMABLE) ||
__xfs_iflags_test(ip, XFS_IRECLAIM)) {
/* not a reclaim candidate. */
spin_unlock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
return 1;
return false;
}
__xfs_iflags_set(ip, XFS_IRECLAIM);
spin_unlock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
return 0;
return true;
}
/*
......@@ -1114,8 +1103,7 @@ xfs_reclaim_inode_grab(
static bool
xfs_reclaim_inode(
struct xfs_inode *ip,
struct xfs_perag *pag,
int sync_mode)
struct xfs_perag *pag)
{
xfs_ino_t ino = ip->i_ino; /* for radix_tree_delete */
......@@ -1209,7 +1197,6 @@ xfs_reclaim_inode(
static int
xfs_reclaim_inodes_ag(
struct xfs_mount *mp,
int flags,
int *nr_to_scan)
{
struct xfs_perag *pag;
......@@ -1254,7 +1241,7 @@ xfs_reclaim_inodes_ag(
for (i = 0; i < nr_found; i++) {
struct xfs_inode *ip = batch[i];
if (done || xfs_reclaim_inode_grab(ip, flags))
if (done || !xfs_reclaim_inode_grab(ip))
batch[i] = NULL;
/*
......@@ -1285,7 +1272,7 @@ xfs_reclaim_inodes_ag(
for (i = 0; i < nr_found; i++) {
if (!batch[i])
continue;
if (!xfs_reclaim_inode(batch[i], pag, flags))
if (!xfs_reclaim_inode(batch[i], pag))
skipped++;
}
......@@ -1311,13 +1298,13 @@ xfs_reclaim_inodes(
int nr_to_scan = INT_MAX;
int skipped;
xfs_reclaim_inodes_ag(mp, mode, &nr_to_scan);
xfs_reclaim_inodes_ag(mp, &nr_to_scan);
if (!(mode & SYNC_WAIT))
return 0;
do {
xfs_ail_push_all_sync(mp->m_ail);
skipped = xfs_reclaim_inodes_ag(mp, mode, &nr_to_scan);
skipped = xfs_reclaim_inodes_ag(mp, &nr_to_scan);
} while (skipped > 0);
return 0;
......@@ -1341,7 +1328,7 @@ xfs_reclaim_inodes_nr(
xfs_reclaim_work_queue(mp);
xfs_ail_push_all(mp->m_ail);
xfs_reclaim_inodes_ag(mp, SYNC_TRYLOCK, &nr_to_scan);
xfs_reclaim_inodes_ag(mp, &nr_to_scan);
return 0;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment