Commit 5492390a authored by Ying Xue's avatar Ying Xue Committed by David S. Miller

tipc: simplify relationship between name table lock and node lock

When tipc name sequence is published, name table lock is released
before name sequence buffer is delivered to remote nodes through its
underlying unicast links. However, when name sequence is withdrawn,
the name table lock is held until the transmission of the removal
message of name sequence is finished. During the process, node lock
is nested in name table lock. To prevent node lock from being nested
in name table lock, while withdrawing name, we should adopt the same
locking policy of publishing name sequence: name table lock should
be released before message is sent.
Signed-off-by: default avatarYing Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarErik Hugne <erik.hugne@ericsson.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com>
Tested-by: default avatarErik Hugne <erik.hugne@ericsson.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 3493d25c
......@@ -685,27 +685,28 @@ struct publication *tipc_nametbl_publish(u32 type, u32 lower, u32 upper,
int tipc_nametbl_withdraw(u32 type, u32 lower, u32 ref, u32 key)
{
struct publication *publ;
struct sk_buff *buf;
struct sk_buff *skb = NULL;
write_lock_bh(&tipc_nametbl_lock);
publ = tipc_nametbl_remove_publ(type, lower, tipc_own_addr, ref, key);
if (likely(publ)) {
tipc_nametbl->local_publ_count--;
buf = tipc_named_withdraw(publ);
skb = tipc_named_withdraw(publ);
/* Any pending external events? */
tipc_named_process_backlog();
write_unlock_bh(&tipc_nametbl_lock);
list_del_init(&publ->pport_list);
kfree(publ);
if (buf)
named_cluster_distribute(buf);
return 1;
}
write_unlock_bh(&tipc_nametbl_lock);
} else {
pr_err("Unable to remove local publication\n"
"(type=%u, lower=%u, ref=%u, key=%u)\n",
type, lower, ref, key);
}
write_unlock_bh(&tipc_nametbl_lock);
if (skb) {
named_cluster_distribute(skb);
return 1;
}
return 0;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment