Commit 5877019d authored by Tejun Heo's avatar Tejun Heo

device_cgroup: remove direct access to cgroup->children

Currently, devcg::has_children() directly tests cgroup->children for
list emptiness.  The field is not a published field and scheduled to
go away.  In addition, the test isn't strictly correct as devcg should
only care about children which are visible to userland.

This patch converts has_children() to use css_next_child() instead.
The subtle incorrectness is noted and will be dealt with later.
Signed-off-by: default avatarTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: default avatarAristeu Rozanski <aris@redhat.com>
Acked-by: default avatarSerge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@ubuntu.com>
Acked-by: default avatarLi Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
parent ea280e7b
...@@ -589,9 +589,17 @@ static int propagate_exception(struct dev_cgroup *devcg_root, ...@@ -589,9 +589,17 @@ static int propagate_exception(struct dev_cgroup *devcg_root,
static inline bool has_children(struct dev_cgroup *devcgroup) static inline bool has_children(struct dev_cgroup *devcgroup)
{ {
struct cgroup *cgrp = devcgroup->css.cgroup; bool ret;
return !list_empty(&cgrp->children); /*
* FIXME: There may be lingering offline csses and this function
* may return %true when there isn't any userland-visible child
* which is incorrect for our purposes.
*/
rcu_read_lock();
ret = css_next_child(NULL, &devcgroup->css);
rcu_read_unlock();
return ret;
} }
/* /*
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment