Commit 5a605fd6 authored by Darrick J. Wong's avatar Darrick J. Wong Committed by Dave Chinner

xfs: recalculate free rt extents after log recovery

I've been observing periodic corruption reports from xfs_scrub involving
the free rt extent counter (frextents) while running xfs/141.  That test
uses an error injection knob to induce a torn write to the log, and an
arbitrary number of recovery mounts, frextents will count fewer free rt
extents than can be found the rtbitmap.

The root cause of the problem is a combination of the misuse of
sb_frextents in the incore mount to reflect both incore reservations
made by running transactions as well as the actual count of free rt
extents on disk.  The following sequence can reproduce the undercount:

Thread 1			Thread 2
xfs_trans_alloc(rtextents=3)
xfs_mod_frextents(-3)
<blocks>
				xfs_attr_set()
				xfs_bmap_attr_addfork()
				xfs_add_attr2()
				xfs_log_sb()
				xfs_sb_to_disk()
				xfs_trans_commit()
<log flushed to disk>
<log goes down>

Note that thread 1 subtracts 3 from sb_frextents even though it never
commits to using that space.  Thread 2 writes the undercounted value to
the ondisk superblock and logs it to the xattr transaction, which is
then flushed to disk.  At next mount, log recovery will find the logged
superblock and write that back into the filesystem.  At the end of log
recovery, we reread the superblock and install the recovered
undercounted frextents value into the incore superblock.  From that
point on, we've effectively leaked thread 1's transaction reservation.

The correct fix for this is to separate the incore reservation from the
ondisk usage, but that's a matter for the next patch.  Because the
kernel has been logging superblocks with undercounted frextents for a
very long time and we don't demand that sysadmins run xfs_repair after a
crash, fix the undercount by recomputing frextents after log recovery.

Gating this on log recovery is a reasonable balance (I think) between
correcting the problem and slowing down every mount attempt.  Note that
xfs_repair will fix undercounted frextents.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDarrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
parent f34061f5
......@@ -468,6 +468,8 @@ STATIC int
xfs_check_summary_counts(
struct xfs_mount *mp)
{
int error = 0;
/*
* The AG0 superblock verifier rejects in-progress filesystems,
* so we should never see the flag set this far into mounting.
......@@ -506,11 +508,32 @@ xfs_check_summary_counts(
* superblock to be correct and we don't need to do anything here.
* Otherwise, recalculate the summary counters.
*/
if ((!xfs_has_lazysbcount(mp) || xfs_is_clean(mp)) &&
!xfs_fs_has_sickness(mp, XFS_SICK_FS_COUNTERS))
return 0;
if ((xfs_has_lazysbcount(mp) && !xfs_is_clean(mp)) ||
xfs_fs_has_sickness(mp, XFS_SICK_FS_COUNTERS)) {
error = xfs_initialize_perag_data(mp, mp->m_sb.sb_agcount);
if (error)
return error;
}
/*
* Older kernels misused sb_frextents to reflect both incore
* reservations made by running transactions and the actual count of
* free rt extents in the ondisk metadata. Transactions committed
* during runtime can therefore contain a superblock update that
* undercounts the number of free rt extents tracked in the rt bitmap.
* A clean unmount record will have the correct frextents value since
* there can be no other transactions running at that point.
*
* If we're mounting the rt volume after recovering the log, recompute
* frextents from the rtbitmap file to fix the inconsistency.
*/
if (xfs_has_realtime(mp) && !xfs_is_clean(mp)) {
error = xfs_rtalloc_reinit_frextents(mp);
if (error)
return error;
}
return xfs_initialize_perag_data(mp, mp->m_sb.sb_agcount);
return 0;
}
/*
......@@ -784,11 +807,6 @@ xfs_mountfs(
goto out_inodegc_shrinker;
}
/* Make sure the summary counts are ok. */
error = xfs_check_summary_counts(mp);
if (error)
goto out_log_dealloc;
/* Enable background inode inactivation workers. */
xfs_inodegc_start(mp);
xfs_blockgc_start(mp);
......@@ -844,6 +862,11 @@ xfs_mountfs(
goto out_rele_rip;
}
/* Make sure the summary counts are ok. */
error = xfs_check_summary_counts(mp);
if (error)
goto out_rtunmount;
/*
* If this is a read-only mount defer the superblock updates until
* the next remount into writeable mode. Otherwise we would never
......
......@@ -1284,6 +1284,43 @@ xfs_rtmount_init(
return 0;
}
static int
xfs_rtalloc_count_frextent(
struct xfs_mount *mp,
struct xfs_trans *tp,
const struct xfs_rtalloc_rec *rec,
void *priv)
{
uint64_t *valp = priv;
*valp += rec->ar_extcount;
return 0;
}
/*
* Reinitialize the number of free realtime extents from the realtime bitmap.
* Callers must ensure that there is no other activity in the filesystem.
*/
int
xfs_rtalloc_reinit_frextents(
struct xfs_mount *mp)
{
uint64_t val = 0;
int error;
xfs_ilock(mp->m_rbmip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
error = xfs_rtalloc_query_all(mp, NULL, xfs_rtalloc_count_frextent,
&val);
xfs_iunlock(mp->m_rbmip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
if (error)
return error;
spin_lock(&mp->m_sb_lock);
mp->m_sb.sb_frextents = val;
spin_unlock(&mp->m_sb_lock);
return 0;
}
/*
* Get the bitmap and summary inodes and the summary cache into the mount
* structure at mount time.
......
......@@ -135,6 +135,7 @@ bool xfs_verify_rtbno(struct xfs_mount *mp, xfs_rtblock_t rtbno);
int xfs_rtalloc_extent_is_free(struct xfs_mount *mp, struct xfs_trans *tp,
xfs_rtblock_t start, xfs_extlen_t len,
bool *is_free);
int xfs_rtalloc_reinit_frextents(struct xfs_mount *mp);
#else
# define xfs_rtallocate_extent(t,b,min,max,l,f,p,rb) (ENOSYS)
# define xfs_rtfree_extent(t,b,l) (ENOSYS)
......@@ -145,6 +146,7 @@ int xfs_rtalloc_extent_is_free(struct xfs_mount *mp, struct xfs_trans *tp,
# define xfs_rtbuf_get(m,t,b,i,p) (ENOSYS)
# define xfs_verify_rtbno(m, r) (false)
# define xfs_rtalloc_extent_is_free(m,t,s,l,i) (ENOSYS)
# define xfs_rtalloc_reinit_frextents(m) (0)
static inline int /* error */
xfs_rtmount_init(
xfs_mount_t *mp) /* file system mount structure */
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment