Commit 5bfb3a4b authored by Jeremy Cline's avatar Jeremy Cline Committed by Jonathan Cameron

iio: accel: bmc150: Check for a second ACPI device for BOSC0200

Some BOSC0200 acpi_device-s describe two accelerometers in a single ACPI
device. Normally we would handle this by letting the special
drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c driver handle the BOSC0200
ACPI id and let it instantiate 2 bmc150_accel type i2c_client-s for us.

But doing so changes the modalias for the first accelerometer
(which is already supported and used on many devices) from
acpi:BOSC0200 to i2c:bmc150_accel. The modalias is not only used
to load the driver, but is also used by hwdb matches in
/lib/udev/hwdb.d/60-sensor.hwdb which provide a mountmatrix to
userspace by setting the ACCEL_MOUNT_MATRIX udev property.

Switching the handling of the BOSC0200 over to i2c-multi-instantiate.c
will break the hwdb matches causing the ACCEL_MOUNT_MATRIX udev prop
to no longer be set. So switching over to i2c-multi-instantiate.c is
not an option.

Changes by Hans de Goede:
-Add explanation to the commit message why i2c-multi-instantiate.c
 cannot be used
-Also set the dev_name, fwnode and irq i2c_board_info struct members
 for the 2nd client
Signed-off-by: default avatarJeremy Cline <jeremy@jcline.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarHans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarAndy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201130141954.339805-2-hdegoede@redhat.com
BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198671Signed-off-by: default avatarJonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
parent e488fed0
...@@ -206,6 +206,7 @@ struct bmc150_accel_data { ...@@ -206,6 +206,7 @@ struct bmc150_accel_data {
int ev_enable_state; int ev_enable_state;
int64_t timestamp, old_timestamp; /* Only used in hw fifo mode. */ int64_t timestamp, old_timestamp; /* Only used in hw fifo mode. */
const struct bmc150_accel_chip_info *chip_info; const struct bmc150_accel_chip_info *chip_info;
struct i2c_client *second_device;
struct iio_mount_matrix orientation; struct iio_mount_matrix orientation;
}; };
...@@ -1701,6 +1702,26 @@ int bmc150_accel_core_probe(struct device *dev, struct regmap *regmap, int irq, ...@@ -1701,6 +1702,26 @@ int bmc150_accel_core_probe(struct device *dev, struct regmap *regmap, int irq,
} }
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bmc150_accel_core_probe); EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bmc150_accel_core_probe);
struct i2c_client *bmc150_get_second_device(struct i2c_client *client)
{
struct bmc150_accel_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
if (!data)
return NULL;
return data->second_device;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bmc150_get_second_device);
void bmc150_set_second_device(struct i2c_client *client)
{
struct bmc150_accel_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
if (data)
data->second_device = client;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bmc150_set_second_device);
int bmc150_accel_core_remove(struct device *dev) int bmc150_accel_core_remove(struct device *dev)
{ {
struct iio_dev *indio_dev = dev_get_drvdata(dev); struct iio_dev *indio_dev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
......
...@@ -30,6 +30,8 @@ static int bmc150_accel_probe(struct i2c_client *client, ...@@ -30,6 +30,8 @@ static int bmc150_accel_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
i2c_check_functionality(client->adapter, I2C_FUNC_I2C) || i2c_check_functionality(client->adapter, I2C_FUNC_I2C) ||
i2c_check_functionality(client->adapter, i2c_check_functionality(client->adapter,
I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_READ_I2C_BLOCK); I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_READ_I2C_BLOCK);
struct acpi_device __maybe_unused *adev;
int ret;
regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, &bmc150_regmap_conf); regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, &bmc150_regmap_conf);
if (IS_ERR(regmap)) { if (IS_ERR(regmap)) {
...@@ -40,12 +42,47 @@ static int bmc150_accel_probe(struct i2c_client *client, ...@@ -40,12 +42,47 @@ static int bmc150_accel_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
if (id) if (id)
name = id->name; name = id->name;
return bmc150_accel_core_probe(&client->dev, regmap, client->irq, name, ret = bmc150_accel_core_probe(&client->dev, regmap, client->irq, name, block_supported);
block_supported); if (ret)
return ret;
/*
* Some BOSC0200 acpi_devices describe 2 accelerometers in a single ACPI
* device, try instantiating a second i2c_client for an I2cSerialBusV2
* ACPI resource with index 1. The !id check avoids recursion when
* bmc150_accel_probe() gets called for the second client.
*/
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
adev = ACPI_COMPANION(&client->dev);
if (!id && adev && strcmp(acpi_device_hid(adev), "BOSC0200") == 0) {
struct i2c_board_info board_info = {
.type = "bmc150_accel",
/*
* The 2nd accel sits in the base of 2-in-1s. Note this
* name is static, as there should never be more then 1
* BOSC0200 ACPI node with 2 accelerometers in it.
*/
.dev_name = "BOSC0200:base",
.fwnode = client->dev.fwnode,
.irq = -ENOENT,
};
struct i2c_client *second_dev;
second_dev = i2c_acpi_new_device(&client->dev, 1, &board_info);
if (!IS_ERR(second_dev))
bmc150_set_second_device(second_dev);
}
#endif
return 0;
} }
static int bmc150_accel_remove(struct i2c_client *client) static int bmc150_accel_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
{ {
struct i2c_client *second_dev = bmc150_get_second_device(client);
i2c_unregister_device(second_dev);
return bmc150_accel_core_remove(&client->dev); return bmc150_accel_core_remove(&client->dev);
} }
......
...@@ -17,6 +17,8 @@ enum { ...@@ -17,6 +17,8 @@ enum {
int bmc150_accel_core_probe(struct device *dev, struct regmap *regmap, int irq, int bmc150_accel_core_probe(struct device *dev, struct regmap *regmap, int irq,
const char *name, bool block_supported); const char *name, bool block_supported);
int bmc150_accel_core_remove(struct device *dev); int bmc150_accel_core_remove(struct device *dev);
struct i2c_client *bmc150_get_second_device(struct i2c_client *second_device);
void bmc150_set_second_device(struct i2c_client *second_device);
extern const struct dev_pm_ops bmc150_accel_pm_ops; extern const struct dev_pm_ops bmc150_accel_pm_ops;
extern const struct regmap_config bmc150_regmap_conf; extern const struct regmap_config bmc150_regmap_conf;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment