Commit 6baacf93 authored by Dhruva Gole's avatar Dhruva Gole Committed by Rafael J. Wysocki

cpuidle: remove dead code from cpuidle_enter_state()

Checking for index < 0 is useless because the find_deepest_state()
function never really returns a negative value.

Since this hasn't been reported in over 9 years it's dead code, so
remove it.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240821114250.1416421-1-d-gole@ti.com
[ rjw: Subject and changelog edits ]
Signed-off-by: default avatarRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
parent d5c667e0
...@@ -228,10 +228,7 @@ noinstr int cpuidle_enter_state(struct cpuidle_device *dev, ...@@ -228,10 +228,7 @@ noinstr int cpuidle_enter_state(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
if (broadcast && tick_broadcast_enter()) { if (broadcast && tick_broadcast_enter()) {
index = find_deepest_state(drv, dev, target_state->exit_latency_ns, index = find_deepest_state(drv, dev, target_state->exit_latency_ns,
CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIMER_STOP, false); CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIMER_STOP, false);
if (index < 0) {
default_idle_call();
return -EBUSY;
}
target_state = &drv->states[index]; target_state = &drv->states[index];
broadcast = false; broadcast = false;
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment