Commit 77fad8bf authored by Gustavo Romero's avatar Gustavo Romero Committed by Michael Ellerman

selftests/powerpc: Check FP/VEC on exception in TM

Add a self test to check if FP/VEC/VSX registers are sane (restored
correctly) after a FP/VEC/VSX unavailable exception is caught during a
transaction.

This test checks all possibilities in a thread regarding the combination
of MSR.[FP|VEC] states in a thread and for each scenario raises a
FP/VEC/VSX unavailable exception in transactional state, verifying if
vs0 and vs32 registers, which are representatives of FP/VEC/VSX reg
sets, are not corrupted.
Signed-off-by: default avatarGustavo Romero <gromero@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarBreno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarCyril Bur <cyrilbur@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
parent 80eff6c4
...@@ -12,3 +12,4 @@ tm-signal-context-chk-gpr ...@@ -12,3 +12,4 @@ tm-signal-context-chk-gpr
tm-signal-context-chk-vmx tm-signal-context-chk-vmx
tm-signal-context-chk-vsx tm-signal-context-chk-vsx
tm-vmx-unavail tm-vmx-unavail
tm-unavailable
...@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ SIGNAL_CONTEXT_CHK_TESTS := tm-signal-context-chk-gpr tm-signal-context-chk-fpu ...@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ SIGNAL_CONTEXT_CHK_TESTS := tm-signal-context-chk-gpr tm-signal-context-chk-fpu
tm-signal-context-chk-vmx tm-signal-context-chk-vsx tm-signal-context-chk-vmx tm-signal-context-chk-vsx
TEST_GEN_PROGS := tm-resched-dscr tm-syscall tm-signal-msr-resv tm-signal-stack \ TEST_GEN_PROGS := tm-resched-dscr tm-syscall tm-signal-msr-resv tm-signal-stack \
tm-vmxcopy tm-fork tm-tar tm-tmspr tm-vmx-unavail \ tm-vmxcopy tm-fork tm-tar tm-tmspr tm-vmx-unavail tm-unavailable \
$(SIGNAL_CONTEXT_CHK_TESTS) $(SIGNAL_CONTEXT_CHK_TESTS)
include ../../lib.mk include ../../lib.mk
...@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ $(OUTPUT)/tm-syscall: CFLAGS += -I../../../../../usr/include ...@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ $(OUTPUT)/tm-syscall: CFLAGS += -I../../../../../usr/include
$(OUTPUT)/tm-tmspr: CFLAGS += -pthread $(OUTPUT)/tm-tmspr: CFLAGS += -pthread
$(OUTPUT)/tm-vmx-unavail: CFLAGS += -pthread -m64 $(OUTPUT)/tm-vmx-unavail: CFLAGS += -pthread -m64
$(OUTPUT)/tm-resched-dscr: ../pmu/lib.o $(OUTPUT)/tm-resched-dscr: ../pmu/lib.o
$(OUTPUT)/tm-unavailable: CFLAGS += -O0 -pthread -m64 -Wno-error=uninitialized -mvsx
SIGNAL_CONTEXT_CHK_TESTS := $(patsubst %,$(OUTPUT)/%,$(SIGNAL_CONTEXT_CHK_TESTS)) SIGNAL_CONTEXT_CHK_TESTS := $(patsubst %,$(OUTPUT)/%,$(SIGNAL_CONTEXT_CHK_TESTS))
$(SIGNAL_CONTEXT_CHK_TESTS): tm-signal.S $(SIGNAL_CONTEXT_CHK_TESTS): tm-signal.S
......
/*
* Copyright 2017, Gustavo Romero, Breno Leitao, Cyril Bur, IBM Corp.
* Licensed under GPLv2.
*
* Force FP, VEC and VSX unavailable exception during transaction in all
* possible scenarios regarding the MSR.FP and MSR.VEC state, e.g. when FP
* is enable and VEC is disable, when FP is disable and VEC is enable, and
* so on. Then we check if the restored state is correctly set for the
* FP and VEC registers to the previous state we set just before we entered
* in TM, i.e. we check if it corrupts somehow the recheckpointed FP and
* VEC/Altivec registers on abortion due to an unavailable exception in TM.
* N.B. In this test we do not test all the FP/Altivec/VSX registers for
* corruption, but only for registers vs0 and vs32, which are respectively
* representatives of FP and VEC/Altivec reg sets.
*/
#define _GNU_SOURCE
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <inttypes.h>
#include <stdbool.h>
#include <pthread.h>
#include <sched.h>
#include "tm.h"
#define DEBUG 0
/* Unavailable exceptions to test in HTM */
#define FP_UNA_EXCEPTION 0
#define VEC_UNA_EXCEPTION 1
#define VSX_UNA_EXCEPTION 2
#define NUM_EXCEPTIONS 3
struct Flags {
int touch_fp;
int touch_vec;
int result;
int exception;
} flags;
bool expecting_failure(void)
{
if (flags.touch_fp && flags.exception == FP_UNA_EXCEPTION)
return false;
if (flags.touch_vec && flags.exception == VEC_UNA_EXCEPTION)
return false;
/*
* If both FP and VEC are touched it does not mean that touching VSX
* won't raise an exception. However since FP and VEC state are already
* correctly loaded, the transaction is not aborted (i.e.
* treclaimed/trecheckpointed) and MSR.VSX is just set as 1, so a TM
* failure is not expected also in this case.
*/
if ((flags.touch_fp && flags.touch_vec) &&
flags.exception == VSX_UNA_EXCEPTION)
return false;
return true;
}
/* Check if failure occurred whilst in transaction. */
bool is_failure(uint64_t condition_reg)
{
/*
* When failure handling occurs, CR0 is set to 0b1010 (0xa). Otherwise
* transaction completes without failure and hence reaches out 'tend.'
* that sets CR0 to 0b0100 (0x4).
*/
return ((condition_reg >> 28) & 0xa) == 0xa;
}
void *ping(void *input)
{
/*
* Expected values for vs0 and vs32 after a TM failure. They must never
* change, otherwise they got corrupted.
*/
uint64_t high_vs0 = 0x5555555555555555;
uint64_t low_vs0 = 0xffffffffffffffff;
uint64_t high_vs32 = 0x5555555555555555;
uint64_t low_vs32 = 0xffffffffffffffff;
/* Counter for busy wait */
uint64_t counter = 0x1ff000000;
/*
* Variable to keep a copy of CR register content taken just after we
* leave the transactional state.
*/
uint64_t cr_ = 0;
/*
* Wait a bit so thread can get its name "ping". This is not important
* to reproduce the issue but it's nice to have for systemtap debugging.
*/
if (DEBUG)
sleep(1);
printf("If MSR.FP=%d MSR.VEC=%d: ", flags.touch_fp, flags.touch_vec);
if (flags.exception != FP_UNA_EXCEPTION &&
flags.exception != VEC_UNA_EXCEPTION &&
flags.exception != VSX_UNA_EXCEPTION) {
printf("No valid exception specified to test.\n");
return NULL;
}
asm (
/* Prepare to merge low and high. */
" mtvsrd 33, %[high_vs0] ;"
" mtvsrd 34, %[low_vs0] ;"
/*
* Adjust VS0 expected value after an TM failure,
* i.e. vs0 = 0x5555555555555555555FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
*/
" xxmrghd 0, 33, 34 ;"
/*
* Adjust VS32 expected value after an TM failure,
* i.e. vs32 = 0x5555555555555555555FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
*/
" xxmrghd 32, 33, 34 ;"
/*
* Wait an amount of context switches so load_fp and load_vec
* overflow and MSR.FP, MSR.VEC, and MSR.VSX become zero (off).
*/
" mtctr %[counter] ;"
/* Decrement CTR branch if CTR non zero. */
"1: bdnz 1b ;"
/*
* Check if we want to touch FP prior to the test in order
* to set MSR.FP = 1 before provoking an unavailable
* exception in TM.
*/
" cmpldi %[touch_fp], 0 ;"
" beq no_fp ;"
" fadd 10, 10, 10 ;"
"no_fp: ;"
/*
* Check if we want to touch VEC prior to the test in order
* to set MSR.VEC = 1 before provoking an unavailable
* exception in TM.
*/
" cmpldi %[touch_vec], 0 ;"
" beq no_vec ;"
" vaddcuw 10, 10, 10 ;"
"no_vec: ;"
/*
* Perhaps it would be a better idea to do the
* compares outside transactional context and simply
* duplicate code.
*/
" tbegin. ;"
" beq trans_fail ;"
/* Do we do FP Unavailable? */
" cmpldi %[exception], %[ex_fp] ;"
" bne 1f ;"
" fadd 10, 10, 10 ;"
" b done ;"
/* Do we do VEC Unavailable? */
"1: cmpldi %[exception], %[ex_vec] ;"
" bne 2f ;"
" vaddcuw 10, 10, 10 ;"
" b done ;"
/*
* Not FP or VEC, therefore VSX. Ensure this
* instruction always generates a VSX Unavailable.
* ISA 3.0 is tricky here.
* (xxmrghd will on ISA 2.07 and ISA 3.0)
*/
"2: xxmrghd 10, 10, 10 ;"
"done: tend. ;"
"trans_fail: ;"
/* Give values back to C. */
" mfvsrd %[high_vs0], 0 ;"
" xxsldwi 3, 0, 0, 2 ;"
" mfvsrd %[low_vs0], 3 ;"
" mfvsrd %[high_vs32], 32 ;"
" xxsldwi 3, 32, 32, 2 ;"
" mfvsrd %[low_vs32], 3 ;"
/* Give CR back to C so that it can check what happened. */
" mfcr %[cr_] ;"
: [high_vs0] "+r" (high_vs0),
[low_vs0] "+r" (low_vs0),
[high_vs32] "=r" (high_vs32),
[low_vs32] "=r" (low_vs32),
[cr_] "+r" (cr_)
: [touch_fp] "r" (flags.touch_fp),
[touch_vec] "r" (flags.touch_vec),
[exception] "r" (flags.exception),
[ex_fp] "i" (FP_UNA_EXCEPTION),
[ex_vec] "i" (VEC_UNA_EXCEPTION),
[ex_vsx] "i" (VSX_UNA_EXCEPTION),
[counter] "r" (counter)
: "cr0", "ctr", "v10", "vs0", "vs10", "vs3", "vs32", "vs33",
"vs34", "fr10"
);
/*
* Check if we were expecting a failure and it did not occur by checking
* CR0 state just after we leave the transaction. Either way we check if
* vs0 or vs32 got corrupted.
*/
if (expecting_failure() && !is_failure(cr_)) {
printf("\n\tExpecting the transaction to fail, %s",
"but it didn't\n\t");
flags.result++;
}
/* Check if we were not expecting a failure and a it occurred. */
if (!expecting_failure() && is_failure(cr_)) {
printf("\n\tUnexpected transaction failure 0x%02lx\n\t",
failure_code());
return (void *) -1;
}
/*
* Check if TM failed due to the cause we were expecting. 0xda is a
* TM_CAUSE_FAC_UNAV cause, otherwise it's an unexpected cause.
*/
if (is_failure(cr_) && !failure_is_unavailable()) {
printf("\n\tUnexpected failure cause 0x%02lx\n\t",
failure_code());
return (void *) -1;
}
/* 0x4 is a success and 0xa is a fail. See comment in is_failure(). */
if (DEBUG)
printf("CR0: 0x%1lx ", cr_ >> 28);
/* Check FP (vs0) for the expected value. */
if (high_vs0 != 0x5555555555555555 || low_vs0 != 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF) {
printf("FP corrupted!");
printf(" high = %#16" PRIx64 " low = %#16" PRIx64 " ",
high_vs0, low_vs0);
flags.result++;
} else
printf("FP ok ");
/* Check VEC (vs32) for the expected value. */
if (high_vs32 != 0x5555555555555555 || low_vs32 != 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF) {
printf("VEC corrupted!");
printf(" high = %#16" PRIx64 " low = %#16" PRIx64,
high_vs32, low_vs32);
flags.result++;
} else
printf("VEC ok");
putchar('\n');
return NULL;
}
/* Thread to force context switch */
void *pong(void *not_used)
{
/* Wait thread get its name "pong". */
if (DEBUG)
sleep(1);
/* Classed as an interactive-like thread. */
while (1)
sched_yield();
}
/* Function that creates a thread and launches the "ping" task. */
void test_fp_vec(int fp, int vec, pthread_attr_t *attr)
{
int retries = 2;
void *ret_value;
pthread_t t0;
flags.touch_fp = fp;
flags.touch_vec = vec;
/*
* Without luck it's possible that the transaction is aborted not due to
* the unavailable exception caught in the middle as we expect but also,
* for instance, due to a context switch or due to a KVM reschedule (if
* it's running on a VM). Thus we try a few times before giving up,
* checking if the failure cause is the one we expect.
*/
do {
/* Bind 'ping' to CPU 0, as specified in 'attr'. */
pthread_create(&t0, attr, ping, (void *) &flags);
pthread_setname_np(t0, "ping");
pthread_join(t0, &ret_value);
retries--;
} while (ret_value != NULL && retries);
if (!retries) {
flags.result = 1;
if (DEBUG)
printf("All transactions failed unexpectedly\n");
}
}
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
int exception; /* FP = 0, VEC = 1, VSX = 2 */
pthread_t t1;
pthread_attr_t attr;
cpu_set_t cpuset;
/* Set only CPU 0 in the mask. Both threads will be bound to CPU 0. */
CPU_ZERO(&cpuset);
CPU_SET(0, &cpuset);
/* Init pthread attribute. */
pthread_attr_init(&attr);
/* Set CPU 0 mask into the pthread attribute. */
pthread_attr_setaffinity_np(&attr, sizeof(cpu_set_t), &cpuset);
pthread_create(&t1, &attr /* Bind 'pong' to CPU 0 */, pong, NULL);
pthread_setname_np(t1, "pong"); /* Name it for systemtap convenience */
flags.result = 0;
for (exception = 0; exception < NUM_EXCEPTIONS; exception++) {
printf("Checking if FP/VEC registers are sane after");
if (exception == FP_UNA_EXCEPTION)
printf(" a FP unavailable exception...\n");
else if (exception == VEC_UNA_EXCEPTION)
printf(" a VEC unavailable exception...\n");
else
printf(" a VSX unavailable exception...\n");
flags.exception = exception;
test_fp_vec(0, 0, &attr);
test_fp_vec(1, 0, &attr);
test_fp_vec(0, 1, &attr);
test_fp_vec(1, 1, &attr);
}
if (flags.result > 0) {
printf("result: failed!\n");
exit(1);
} else {
printf("result: success\n");
exit(0);
}
}
...@@ -47,6 +47,11 @@ static inline bool failure_is_syscall(void) ...@@ -47,6 +47,11 @@ static inline bool failure_is_syscall(void)
return (failure_code() & TM_CAUSE_SYSCALL) == TM_CAUSE_SYSCALL; return (failure_code() & TM_CAUSE_SYSCALL) == TM_CAUSE_SYSCALL;
} }
static inline bool failure_is_unavailable(void)
{
return (failure_code() & TM_CAUSE_FAC_UNAV) == TM_CAUSE_FAC_UNAV;
}
static inline bool failure_is_nesting(void) static inline bool failure_is_nesting(void)
{ {
return (__builtin_get_texasru() & 0x400000); return (__builtin_get_texasru() & 0x400000);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment