Commit 7863c054 authored by Veaceslav Falico's avatar Veaceslav Falico Committed by David S. Miller

net: use lists as arguments instead of bool upper

Currently we make use of bool upper when we want to specify if we want to
work with upper/lower list. It's, however, harder to read, debug and
occupies a lot more code.

Fix this by just passing the correct upper/lower_dev_list list_head pointer
instead of bool upper, and work internally with it.

CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
CC: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
CC: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
CC: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
CC: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 4ed377e3
......@@ -4385,12 +4385,9 @@ struct netdev_adjacent {
static struct netdev_adjacent *__netdev_find_adj(struct net_device *dev,
struct net_device *adj_dev,
bool upper)
struct list_head *dev_list)
{
struct netdev_adjacent *adj;
struct list_head *dev_list;
dev_list = upper ? &dev->upper_dev_list : &dev->lower_dev_list;
list_for_each_entry(adj, dev_list, list) {
if (adj->dev == adj_dev)
......@@ -4402,13 +4399,13 @@ static struct netdev_adjacent *__netdev_find_adj(struct net_device *dev,
static inline struct netdev_adjacent *__netdev_find_upper(struct net_device *dev,
struct net_device *udev)
{
return __netdev_find_adj(dev, udev, true);
return __netdev_find_adj(dev, udev, &dev->upper_dev_list);
}
static inline struct netdev_adjacent *__netdev_find_lower(struct net_device *dev,
struct net_device *ldev)
{
return __netdev_find_adj(dev, ldev, false);
return __netdev_find_adj(dev, ldev, &dev->lower_dev_list);
}
/**
......@@ -4514,12 +4511,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_master_upper_dev_get_rcu);
static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(struct net_device *dev,
struct net_device *adj_dev,
bool neighbour, bool master,
bool upper)
struct list_head *dev_list,
bool neighbour, bool master)
{
struct netdev_adjacent *adj;
adj = __netdev_find_adj(dev, adj_dev, upper);
adj = __netdev_find_adj(dev, adj_dev, dev_list);
if (adj) {
BUG_ON(neighbour);
......@@ -4538,19 +4535,14 @@ static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(struct net_device *dev,
dev_hold(adj_dev);
pr_debug("dev_hold for %s, because of %s link added from %s to %s\n",
adj_dev->name, upper ? "upper" : "lower", dev->name,
adj_dev->name);
if (!upper) {
list_add_tail_rcu(&adj->list, &dev->lower_dev_list);
return 0;
}
adj_dev->name, dev_list == &dev->upper_dev_list ?
"upper" : "lower", dev->name, adj_dev->name);
/* Ensure that master upper link is always the first item in list. */
/* Ensure that master link is always the first item in list. */
if (master)
list_add_rcu(&adj->list, &dev->upper_dev_list);
list_add_rcu(&adj->list, dev_list);
else
list_add_tail_rcu(&adj->list, &dev->upper_dev_list);
list_add_tail_rcu(&adj->list, dev_list);
return 0;
}
......@@ -4559,27 +4551,25 @@ static inline int __netdev_upper_dev_insert(struct net_device *dev,
struct net_device *udev,
bool master, bool neighbour)
{
return __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(dev, udev, neighbour, master,
true);
return __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(dev, udev, &dev->upper_dev_list,
neighbour, master);
}
static inline int __netdev_lower_dev_insert(struct net_device *dev,
struct net_device *ldev,
bool neighbour)
{
return __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(dev, ldev, neighbour, false,
false);
return __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(dev, ldev, &dev->lower_dev_list,
neighbour, false);
}
void __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove(struct net_device *dev,
struct net_device *adj_dev, bool upper)
struct net_device *adj_dev,
struct list_head *dev_list)
{
struct netdev_adjacent *adj;
if (upper)
adj = __netdev_find_upper(dev, adj_dev);
else
adj = __netdev_find_lower(dev, adj_dev);
adj = __netdev_find_adj(dev, adj_dev, dev_list);
if (!adj)
BUG();
......@@ -4591,8 +4581,8 @@ void __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove(struct net_device *dev,
list_del_rcu(&adj->list);
pr_debug("dev_put for %s, because of %s link removed from %s to %s\n",
adj_dev->name, upper ? "upper" : "lower", dev->name,
adj_dev->name);
adj_dev->name, dev_list == &dev->upper_dev_list ?
"upper" : "lower", dev->name, adj_dev->name);
dev_put(adj_dev);
kfree_rcu(adj, rcu);
}
......@@ -4600,13 +4590,13 @@ void __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove(struct net_device *dev,
static inline void __netdev_upper_dev_remove(struct net_device *dev,
struct net_device *udev)
{
return __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove(dev, udev, true);
return __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove(dev, udev, &dev->upper_dev_list);
}
static inline void __netdev_lower_dev_remove(struct net_device *dev,
struct net_device *ldev)
{
return __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove(dev, ldev, false);
return __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove(dev, ldev, &dev->lower_dev_list);
}
int __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert_link(struct net_device *dev,
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment