Commit 7ad03a2c authored by Pierre-Louis Bossart's avatar Pierre-Louis Bossart Committed by Mark Brown

ASoC: SOF: Intel: bdw: fix operator precedence warnings

Address cppcheck warnings

sound/soc/sof/intel/bdw.c:265:26: style: Clarify calculation precedence
for '&' and '?'. [clarifyCalculation]
  panic & SHIM_IPCX_BUSY ? "yes" : "no",
                         ^

sound/soc/sof/intel/bdw.c:266:26: style: Clarify calculation
precedence for '&' and '?'. [clarifyCalculation]
  panic & SHIM_IPCX_DONE ? "yes" : "no", panic);
                         ^

sound/soc/sof/intel/bdw.c:269:25: style: Clarify calculation
precedence for '&' and '?'. [clarifyCalculation]
  imrx & SHIM_IMRX_BUSY ? "yes" : "no",
                        ^

sound/soc/sof/intel/bdw.c:270:25: style: Clarify calculation
precedence for '&' and '?'. [clarifyCalculation]
  imrx & SHIM_IMRX_DONE ? "yes" : "no", imrx);
                        ^

sound/soc/sof/intel/bdw.c:273:27: style: Clarify calculation
precedence for '&' and '?'. [clarifyCalculation]
  status & SHIM_IPCD_BUSY ? "yes" : "no",
                          ^

sound/soc/sof/intel/bdw.c:274:27: style: Clarify calculation
precedence for '&' and '?'. [clarifyCalculation]
  status & SHIM_IPCD_DONE ? "yes" : "no", status);
                          ^

sound/soc/sof/intel/bdw.c:277:25: style: Clarify calculation
precedence for '&' and '?'. [clarifyCalculation]
  imrd & SHIM_IMRD_BUSY ? "yes" : "no",
                        ^

sound/soc/sof/intel/bdw.c:278:25: style: Clarify calculation
precedence for '&' and '?'. [clarifyCalculation]
  imrd & SHIM_IMRD_DONE ? "yes" : "no", imrd);
                        ^

Fixes: 3a9e204d ("ASoC: SOF: Intel: Add context data to any IPC timeout.")
Signed-off-by: default avatarPierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191011164312.7988-3-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: default avatarMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
parent f9f618e7
...@@ -262,20 +262,20 @@ static void bdw_dump(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev, u32 flags) ...@@ -262,20 +262,20 @@ static void bdw_dump(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev, u32 flags)
imrd = snd_sof_dsp_read(sdev, BDW_DSP_BAR, SHIM_IMRD); imrd = snd_sof_dsp_read(sdev, BDW_DSP_BAR, SHIM_IMRD);
dev_err(sdev->dev, dev_err(sdev->dev,
"error: ipc host -> DSP: pending %s complete %s raw 0x%8.8x\n", "error: ipc host -> DSP: pending %s complete %s raw 0x%8.8x\n",
panic & SHIM_IPCX_BUSY ? "yes" : "no", (panic & SHIM_IPCX_BUSY) ? "yes" : "no",
panic & SHIM_IPCX_DONE ? "yes" : "no", panic); (panic & SHIM_IPCX_DONE) ? "yes" : "no", panic);
dev_err(sdev->dev, dev_err(sdev->dev,
"error: mask host: pending %s complete %s raw 0x%8.8x\n", "error: mask host: pending %s complete %s raw 0x%8.8x\n",
imrx & SHIM_IMRX_BUSY ? "yes" : "no", (imrx & SHIM_IMRX_BUSY) ? "yes" : "no",
imrx & SHIM_IMRX_DONE ? "yes" : "no", imrx); (imrx & SHIM_IMRX_DONE) ? "yes" : "no", imrx);
dev_err(sdev->dev, dev_err(sdev->dev,
"error: ipc DSP -> host: pending %s complete %s raw 0x%8.8x\n", "error: ipc DSP -> host: pending %s complete %s raw 0x%8.8x\n",
status & SHIM_IPCD_BUSY ? "yes" : "no", (status & SHIM_IPCD_BUSY) ? "yes" : "no",
status & SHIM_IPCD_DONE ? "yes" : "no", status); (status & SHIM_IPCD_DONE) ? "yes" : "no", status);
dev_err(sdev->dev, dev_err(sdev->dev,
"error: mask DSP: pending %s complete %s raw 0x%8.8x\n", "error: mask DSP: pending %s complete %s raw 0x%8.8x\n",
imrd & SHIM_IMRD_BUSY ? "yes" : "no", (imrd & SHIM_IMRD_BUSY) ? "yes" : "no",
imrd & SHIM_IMRD_DONE ? "yes" : "no", imrd); (imrd & SHIM_IMRD_DONE) ? "yes" : "no", imrd);
} }
/* /*
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment