Skip to content

L
linux
Commit 7b24d97f authored by Stephan Mueller's avatar Stephan Mueller Committed by Herbert Xu
Browse files
Options

crypto: doc - describe internal structure 

The kernel crypto API has many indirections which warrant a description
as otherwise one can get easily lost. The description explains the
layers of the kernel crypto API based on examples.
Signed-off-by: default avatarStephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
parent d9850fc5
Show whitespace changes
Inline Side-by-side
Showing with 264 additions and 0 deletions
Documentation/DocBook/crypto-API.tmpl
View file @ 7b24d97f
......@@ -509,6 +509,270 @@
select it due to the used type and mask field.
</para>
</sect1>
<sect1><title>Internal Structure of Kernel Crypto API</title>
<para>
The kernel crypto API has an internal structure where a cipher
implementation may use many layers and indirections. This section
shall help to clarify how the kernel crypto API uses
various components to implement the complete cipher.
</para>
<para>
The following subsections explain the internal structure based
on existing cipher implementations. The first section addresses
the most complex scenario where all other scenarios form a logical
subset.
</para>
<sect2><title>Generic AEAD Cipher Structure</title>
<para>
The following ASCII art decomposes the kernel crypto API layers
when using the AEAD cipher with the automated IV generation. The
shown example is used by the IPSEC layer.
</para>
<para>
For other use cases of AEAD ciphers, the ASCII art applies as
well, but the caller may not use the GIVCIPHER interface. In
this case, the caller must generate the IV.
</para>
<para>
The depicted example decomposes the AEAD cipher of GCM(AES) based
on the generic C implementations (gcm.c, aes-generic.c, ctr.c,
ghash-generic.c, seqiv.c). The generic implementation serves as an
example showing the complete logic of the kernel crypto API.
</para>
<para>
It is possible that some streamlined cipher implementations (like
AES-NI) provide implementations merging aspects which in the view
of the kernel crypto API cannot be decomposed into layers any more.
In case of the AES-NI implementation, the CTR mode, the GHASH
implementation and the AES cipher are all merged into one cipher
implementation registered with the kernel crypto API. In this case,
the concept described by the following ASCII art applies too. However,
the decomposition of GCM into the individual sub-components
by the kernel crypto API is not done any more.
</para>
<para>
Each block in the following ASCII art is an independent cipher
instance obtained from the kernel crypto API. Each block
is accessed by the caller or by other blocks using the API functions
defined by the kernel crypto API for the cipher implementation type.
</para>
<para>
The blocks below indicate the cipher type as well as the specific
logic implemented in the cipher.
</para>
<para>
The ASCII art picture also indicates the call structure, i.e. who
calls which component. The arrows point to the invoked block
where the caller uses the API applicable to the cipher type
specified for the block.
</para>
<programlisting>
<![CDATA[
kernel crypto API | IPSEC Layer
|
+-----------+ |
| | (1)
| givcipher | <----------------------------------- esp_output
| (seqiv) | ---+
+-----------+ |
| (2)
+-----------+ |
| | <--+ (2)
| aead | <----------------------------------- esp_input
| (gcm) | ------------+
+-----------+ |
| (3) | (5)
v v
+-----------+ +-----------+
| | | |
| ablkcipher| | ahash |
| (ctr) | ---+ | (ghash) |
+-----------+ | +-----------+
|
+-----------+ | (4)
| | <--+
| cipher |
| (aes) |
+-----------+
]]>
</programlisting>
<para>
The following call sequence is applicable when the IPSEC layer
triggers an encryption operation with the esp_output function. During
configuration, the administrator set up the use of rfc4106(gcm(aes)) as
the cipher for ESP. The following call sequence is now depicted in the
ASCII art above:
</para>
<orderedlist>
<listitem>
<para>
esp_output() invokes crypto_aead_givencrypt() to trigger an encryption
operation of the GIVCIPHER implementation.
</para>
<para>
In case of GCM, the SEQIV implementation is registered as GIVCIPHER
in crypto_rfc4106_alloc().
</para>
<para>
The SEQIV performs its operation to generate an IV where the core
function is seqiv_geniv().
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
Now, SEQIV uses the AEAD API function calls to invoke the associated
AEAD cipher. In our case, during the instantiation of SEQIV, the
cipher handle for GCM is provided to SEQIV. This means that SEQIV
invokes AEAD cipher operations with the GCM cipher handle.
</para>
<para>
During instantiation of the GCM handle, the CTR(AES) and GHASH
ciphers are instantiated. The cipher handles for CTR(AES) and GHASH
are retained for later use.
</para>
<para>
The GCM implementation is responsible to invoke the CTR mode AES and
the GHASH cipher in the right manner to implement the GCM
specification.
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
The GCM AEAD cipher type implementation now invokes the ABLKCIPHER API
with the instantiated CTR(AES) cipher handle.
</para>
<para>
During instantiation of the CTR(AES) cipher, the CIPHER type
implementation of AES is instantiated. The cipher handle for AES is
retained.
</para>
<para>
That means that the ABLKCIPHER implementation of CTR(AES) only
implements the CTR block chaining mode. After performing the block
chaining operation, the CIPHER implementation of AES is invoked.
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
The ABLKCIPHER of CTR(AES) now invokes the CIPHER API with the AES
cipher handle to encrypt one block.
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
The GCM AEAD implementation also invokes the GHASH cipher
implementation via the AHASH API.
</para>
</listitem>
</orderedlist>
<para>
When the IPSEC layer triggers the esp_input() function, the same call
sequence is followed with the only difference that the operation starts
with step (2).
</para>
</sect2>
<sect2><title>Generic Block Cipher Structure</title>
<para>
Generic block ciphers follow the same concept as depicted with the ASCII
art picture above.
</para>
<para>
For example, CBC(AES) is implemented with cbc.c, and aes-generic.c. The
ASCII art picture above applies as well with the difference that only
step (4) is used and the ABLKCIPHER block chaining mode is CBC.
</para>
</sect2>
<sect2><title>Generic Keyed Message Digest Structure</title>
<para>
Keyed message digest implementations again follow the same concept as
depicted in the ASCII art picture above.
</para>
<para>
For example, HMAC(SHA256) is implemented with hmac.c and
sha256_generic.c. The following ASCII art illustrates the
implementation:
</para>
<programlisting>
<![CDATA[
kernel crypto API | Caller
|
+-----------+ (1) |
| | <------------------ some_function
| ahash |
| (hmac) | ---+
+-----------+ |
| (2)
+-----------+ |
| | <--+
| shash |
| (sha256) |
+-----------+
]]>
</programlisting>
<para>
The following call sequence is applicable when a caller triggers
an HMAC operation:
</para>
<orderedlist>
<listitem>
<para>
The AHASH API functions are invoked by the caller. The HMAC
implementation performs its operation as needed.
</para>
<para>
During initialization of the HMAC cipher, the SHASH cipher type of
SHA256 is instantiated. The cipher handle for the SHA256 instance is
retained.
</para>
<para>
At one time, the HMAC implementation requires a SHA256 operation
where the SHA256 cipher handle is used.
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
The HMAC instance now invokes the SHASH API with the SHA256
cipher handle to calculate the message digest.
</para>
</listitem>
</orderedlist>
</sect2>
</sect1>
</chapter>
<chapter id="Development"><title>Developing Cipher Algorithms</title>
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment
GitLab Nexedi Edition | About GitLab | About Nexedi | 沪ICP备2021021310号-2 | 沪ICP备2021021310号-7