Commit 7d93bd71 authored by Chuck Lever's avatar Chuck Lever Committed by Trond Myklebust

NFS: Repair whitespace damage in NFS PROC macro

Clean up.

When I was making other changes in this area, checkscript.pl
complained about the use of leading blanks in the PROC macros in the
xdr files.
Signed-off-by: default avatarChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Tested-by: default avatarJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
parent 85a56480
...@@ -6301,8 +6301,8 @@ nfs4_stat_to_errno(int stat) ...@@ -6301,8 +6301,8 @@ nfs4_stat_to_errno(int stat)
#define PROC(proc, argtype, restype) \ #define PROC(proc, argtype, restype) \
[NFSPROC4_CLNT_##proc] = { \ [NFSPROC4_CLNT_##proc] = { \
.p_proc = NFSPROC4_COMPOUND, \ .p_proc = NFSPROC4_COMPOUND, \
.p_encode = (kxdrproc_t) nfs4_xdr_##argtype, \ .p_encode = (kxdrproc_t)nfs4_xdr_##argtype, \
.p_decode = (kxdrproc_t) nfs4_xdr_##restype, \ .p_decode = (kxdrproc_t)nfs4_xdr_##restype, \
.p_arglen = NFS4_##argtype##_sz, \ .p_arglen = NFS4_##argtype##_sz, \
.p_replen = NFS4_##restype##_sz, \ .p_replen = NFS4_##restype##_sz, \
.p_statidx = NFSPROC4_CLNT_##proc, \ .p_statidx = NFSPROC4_CLNT_##proc, \
......
...@@ -583,17 +583,17 @@ static int nfs4_xdr_dec_cb_recall(struct rpc_rqst *rqstp, __be32 *p, ...@@ -583,17 +583,17 @@ static int nfs4_xdr_dec_cb_recall(struct rpc_rqst *rqstp, __be32 *p,
#define PROC(proc, call, argtype, restype) \ #define PROC(proc, call, argtype, restype) \
[NFSPROC4_CLNT_##proc] = { \ [NFSPROC4_CLNT_##proc] = { \
.p_proc = NFSPROC4_CB_##call, \ .p_proc = NFSPROC4_CB_##call, \
.p_encode = (kxdrproc_t) nfs4_xdr_##argtype, \ .p_encode = (kxdrproc_t)nfs4_xdr_enc_##argtype, \
.p_decode = (kxdrproc_t) nfs4_xdr_##restype, \ .p_decode = (kxdrproc_t)nfs4_xdr_dec_##restype, \
.p_arglen = NFS4_##argtype##_sz, \ .p_arglen = NFS4_enc_##argtype##_sz, \
.p_replen = NFS4_##restype##_sz, \ .p_replen = NFS4_dec_##restype##_sz, \
.p_statidx = NFSPROC4_CB_##call, \ .p_statidx = NFSPROC4_CB_##call, \
.p_name = #proc, \ .p_name = #proc, \
} }
static struct rpc_procinfo nfs4_cb_procedures[] = { static struct rpc_procinfo nfs4_cb_procedures[] = {
PROC(CB_NULL, NULL, enc_cb_null, dec_cb_null), PROC(CB_NULL, NULL, cb_null, cb_null),
PROC(CB_RECALL, COMPOUND, enc_cb_recall, dec_cb_recall), PROC(CB_RECALL, COMPOUND, cb_recall, cb_recall),
}; };
static struct rpc_version nfs_cb_version4 = { static struct rpc_version nfs_cb_version4 = {
...@@ -609,7 +609,7 @@ static struct rpc_version nfs_cb_version4 = { ...@@ -609,7 +609,7 @@ static struct rpc_version nfs_cb_version4 = {
.procs = nfs4_cb_procedures .procs = nfs4_cb_procedures
}; };
static struct rpc_version * nfs_cb_version[] = { static struct rpc_version *nfs_cb_version[] = {
&nfs_cb_version4, &nfs_cb_version4,
}; };
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment