Commit 7dd5e7c3 authored by NeilBrown's avatar NeilBrown Committed by Linus Torvalds

[PATCH] md: move warning about creating a raid array on partitions of the one device

md tries to warn the user if they e.g.  create a raid1 using two partitions of
the same device, as this does not provide true redundancy.

However it also warns if a raid0 is created like this, and there is nothing
wrong with that.

At the place where the warning is currently printer, we don't necessarily know
what level the array will be, so move the warning from the point where the
device is added to the point where the array is started.
Signed-off-by: default avatarNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent a723406c
...@@ -1297,25 +1297,15 @@ static struct super_type super_types[] = { ...@@ -1297,25 +1297,15 @@ static struct super_type super_types[] = {
}, },
}; };
static mdk_rdev_t * match_dev_unit(mddev_t *mddev, mdk_rdev_t *dev)
{
struct list_head *tmp;
mdk_rdev_t *rdev;
ITERATE_RDEV(mddev,rdev,tmp)
if (rdev->bdev->bd_contains == dev->bdev->bd_contains)
return rdev;
return NULL;
}
static int match_mddev_units(mddev_t *mddev1, mddev_t *mddev2) static int match_mddev_units(mddev_t *mddev1, mddev_t *mddev2)
{ {
struct list_head *tmp; struct list_head *tmp, *tmp2;
mdk_rdev_t *rdev; mdk_rdev_t *rdev, *rdev2;
ITERATE_RDEV(mddev1,rdev,tmp) ITERATE_RDEV(mddev1,rdev,tmp)
if (match_dev_unit(mddev2, rdev)) ITERATE_RDEV(mddev2, rdev2, tmp2)
if (rdev->bdev->bd_contains ==
rdev2->bdev->bd_contains)
return 1; return 1;
return 0; return 0;
...@@ -1325,8 +1315,7 @@ static LIST_HEAD(pending_raid_disks); ...@@ -1325,8 +1315,7 @@ static LIST_HEAD(pending_raid_disks);
static int bind_rdev_to_array(mdk_rdev_t * rdev, mddev_t * mddev) static int bind_rdev_to_array(mdk_rdev_t * rdev, mddev_t * mddev)
{ {
mdk_rdev_t *same_pdev; char b[BDEVNAME_SIZE];
char b[BDEVNAME_SIZE], b2[BDEVNAME_SIZE];
struct kobject *ko; struct kobject *ko;
char *s; char *s;
...@@ -1342,14 +1331,6 @@ static int bind_rdev_to_array(mdk_rdev_t * rdev, mddev_t * mddev) ...@@ -1342,14 +1331,6 @@ static int bind_rdev_to_array(mdk_rdev_t * rdev, mddev_t * mddev)
else else
mddev->size = rdev->size; mddev->size = rdev->size;
} }
same_pdev = match_dev_unit(mddev, rdev);
if (same_pdev)
printk(KERN_WARNING
"%s: WARNING: %s appears to be on the same physical"
" disk as %s. True\n protection against single-disk"
" failure might be compromised.\n",
mdname(mddev), bdevname(rdev->bdev,b),
bdevname(same_pdev->bdev,b2));
/* Verify rdev->desc_nr is unique. /* Verify rdev->desc_nr is unique.
* If it is -1, assign a free number, else * If it is -1, assign a free number, else
...@@ -3109,6 +3090,36 @@ static int do_md_run(mddev_t * mddev) ...@@ -3109,6 +3090,36 @@ static int do_md_run(mddev_t * mddev)
return -EINVAL; return -EINVAL;
} }
if (pers->sync_request) {
/* Warn if this is a potentially silly
* configuration.
*/
char b[BDEVNAME_SIZE], b2[BDEVNAME_SIZE];
mdk_rdev_t *rdev2;
struct list_head *tmp2;
int warned = 0;
ITERATE_RDEV(mddev, rdev, tmp) {
ITERATE_RDEV(mddev, rdev2, tmp2) {
if (rdev < rdev2 &&
rdev->bdev->bd_contains ==
rdev2->bdev->bd_contains) {
printk(KERN_WARNING
"%s: WARNING: %s appears to be"
" on the same physical disk as"
" %s.\n",
mdname(mddev),
bdevname(rdev->bdev,b),
bdevname(rdev2->bdev,b2));
warned = 1;
}
}
}
if (warned)
printk(KERN_WARNING
"True protection against single-disk"
" failure might be compromised.\n");
}
mddev->recovery = 0; mddev->recovery = 0;
mddev->resync_max_sectors = mddev->size << 1; /* may be over-ridden by personality */ mddev->resync_max_sectors = mddev->size << 1; /* may be over-ridden by personality */
mddev->barriers_work = 1; mddev->barriers_work = 1;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment