Commit 7e5998aa authored by Dan Carpenter's avatar Dan Carpenter Committed by David S. Miller

bnx2x: off by one in bnx2x_ets_e3b0_sp_pri_to_cos_set()

The sp_pri_to_cos[] array size depends on the config but lets say it is
BX_E3B0_MAX_NUM_COS_PORT0 and max_num_of_cos is also
DCBX_E3B0_MAX_NUM_COS_PORT0.  In the original code
"pri == max_num_of_cos" was accepted but it is one past the end of the
array.

Also we used "pri" before capping it.  It's a harmless read past the end
of the array, but it would affect which error message gets printed.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Acked-by: default avatarEilon Greenstein <eilong@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 716af4ab
......@@ -942,16 +942,16 @@ static int bnx2x_ets_e3b0_sp_pri_to_cos_set(const struct link_params *params,
const u8 max_num_of_cos = (port) ? DCBX_E3B0_MAX_NUM_COS_PORT1 :
DCBX_E3B0_MAX_NUM_COS_PORT0;
if (sp_pri_to_cos[pri] != DCBX_INVALID_COS) {
if (pri >= max_num_of_cos) {
DP(NETIF_MSG_LINK, "bnx2x_ets_e3b0_sp_pri_to_cos_set invalid "
"parameter There can't be two COS's with "
"the same strict pri\n");
"parameter Illegal strict priority\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
if (pri > max_num_of_cos) {
if (sp_pri_to_cos[pri] != DCBX_INVALID_COS) {
DP(NETIF_MSG_LINK, "bnx2x_ets_e3b0_sp_pri_to_cos_set invalid "
"parameter Illegal strict priority\n");
"parameter There can't be two COS's with "
"the same strict pri\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment