Commit 80532384 authored by Jiri Pirko's avatar Jiri Pirko Committed by David S. Miller

net: sched: fix memleak for chain zero

There's a memleak happening for chain 0. The thing is, chain 0 needs to
be always present, not created on demand. Therefore tcf_block_get upon
creation of block calls the tcf_chain_create function directly. The
chain is created with refcnt == 1, which is not correct in this case and
causes the memleak. So move the refcnt increment into tcf_chain_get
function even for the case when chain needs to be created.
Reported-by: default avatarJakub Kicinski <kubakici@wp.pl>
Fixes: 5bc17018 ("net: sched: introduce multichain support for filters")
Signed-off-by: default avatarJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Tested-by: default avatarJakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 0f2be423
......@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ static struct tcf_chain *tcf_chain_create(struct tcf_block *block,
list_add_tail(&chain->list, &block->chain_list);
chain->block = block;
chain->index = chain_index;
chain->refcnt = 1;
chain->refcnt = 0;
return chain;
}
......@@ -217,15 +217,15 @@ struct tcf_chain *tcf_chain_get(struct tcf_block *block, u32 chain_index,
struct tcf_chain *chain;
list_for_each_entry(chain, &block->chain_list, list) {
if (chain->index == chain_index) {
if (chain->index == chain_index)
goto incref;
}
chain = create ? tcf_chain_create(block, chain_index) : NULL;
incref:
if (chain)
chain->refcnt++;
return chain;
}
}
if (create)
return tcf_chain_create(block, chain_index);
else
return NULL;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(tcf_chain_get);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment