Commit 821eba96 authored by Eric Dumazet's avatar Eric Dumazet Committed by Paolo Abeni

net: optimize napi_schedule_rps()

Based on initial patch from Jason Xing.

Idea is to not raise NET_RX_SOFTIRQ from napi_schedule_rps()
when we queued a packet into another cpu backlog.

We can do this only in the context of us being called indirectly
from net_rx_action(), to have the guarantee our rps_ipi_list
will be processed before we exit from net_rx_action().

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230325152417.5403-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com/Signed-off-by: default avatarEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
Tested-by: default avatarJason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
parent c59647c0
......@@ -4587,8 +4587,6 @@ static void trigger_rx_softirq(void *data)
*
* - If this is another cpu queue, link it to our rps_ipi_list,
* and make sure we will process rps_ipi_list from net_rx_action().
* As we do not know yet if we are called from net_rx_action(),
* we have to raise NET_RX_SOFTIRQ. This might change in the future.
*
* - If this is our own queue, NAPI schedule our backlog.
* Note that this also raises NET_RX_SOFTIRQ.
......@@ -4602,6 +4600,10 @@ static void napi_schedule_rps(struct softnet_data *sd)
sd->rps_ipi_next = mysd->rps_ipi_list;
mysd->rps_ipi_list = sd;
/* If not called from net_rx_action()
* we have to raise NET_RX_SOFTIRQ.
*/
if (!mysd->in_net_rx_action)
__raise_softirq_irqoff(NET_RX_SOFTIRQ);
return;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment