Commit 8460d519 authored by Ismael Luceno's avatar Ismael Luceno Committed by Mauro Carvalho Chehab

[media] solo6x10: reimplement SAA712x setup routine

This cleans up the saa712x setup code and there are no functional changes.
Signed-off-by: default avatarIsmael Luceno <ismael.luceno@corp.bluecherry.net>
[hans.verkuil@cisco.com: add clarification that this is cleanup only]
Signed-off-by: default avatarHans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
parent 14735190
......@@ -513,62 +513,82 @@ static int tw2815_setup(struct solo_dev *solo_dev, u8 dev_addr)
#define FIRST_ACTIVE_LINE 0x0008
#define LAST_ACTIVE_LINE 0x0102
static void saa7128_setup(struct solo_dev *solo_dev)
static void saa712x_write_regs(struct solo_dev *dev, const uint8_t *vals,
int start, int n)
{
int i;
unsigned char regs[128] = {
0x00, 0x10, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x04, 0x00,
0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00,
0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00,
for (;start < n; start++, vals++) {
/* Skip read-only registers */
switch (start) {
/* case 0x00 ... 0x25: */
case 0x2e ... 0x37:
case 0x60:
case 0x7d:
continue;
}
solo_i2c_writebyte(dev, SOLO_I2C_SAA, 0x46, start, *vals);
}
}
#define SAA712x_reg7c (0x80 | ((LAST_ACTIVE_LINE & 0x100) >> 2) \
| ((FIRST_ACTIVE_LINE & 0x100) >> 4))
static void saa712x_setup(struct solo_dev *dev)
{
const int reg_start = 0x26;
const uint8_t saa7128_regs_ntsc[] = {
/* :0x26 */
0x0d, 0x00,
/* :0x28 */
0x59, 0x1d, 0x75, 0x3f, 0x06, 0x3f,
/* :0x2e XXX: read-only */
0x00, 0x00,
0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00,
0x1C, 0x2B, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x0d, 0x00,
0x59, 0x1d, 0x75, 0x3f, 0x06, 0x3f, 0x00, 0x00,
0x1c, 0x33, 0x00, 0x3f, 0x00, 0x00, 0x3f, 0x00,
/* :0x38 */
0x1a, 0x1a, 0x13, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00,
/* :0x40 */
0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x68, 0x10, 0x97, 0x4c, 0x18,
0x9b, 0x93, 0x9f, 0xff, 0x7c, 0x34, 0x3f, 0x3f,
/* :0x50 */
0x3f, 0x83, 0x83, 0x80, 0x0d, 0x0f, 0xc3, 0x06,
0x02, 0x80, 0x71, 0x77, 0xa7, 0x67, 0x66, 0x2e,
/* :0x60 */
0x7b, 0x11, 0x4f, 0x1f, 0x7c, 0xf0, 0x21, 0x77,
0x41, 0x88, 0x41, 0x12, 0xed, 0x10, 0x10, 0x00,
0x41, 0x88, 0x41, 0x52, 0xed, 0x10, 0x10, 0x00,
/* :0x70 */
0x41, 0xc3, 0x00, 0x3e, 0xb8, 0x02, 0x00, 0x00,
0x00, 0x00, 0x08, 0xff, 0x80, 0x00, 0xff, 0xff,
0x00, 0x00, FIRST_ACTIVE_LINE, LAST_ACTIVE_LINE & 0xff,
SAA712x_reg7c, 0x00, 0xff, 0xff,
}, saa7128_regs_pal[] = {
/* :0x26 */
0x0d, 0x00,
/* :0x28 */
0xe1, 0x1d, 0x75, 0x3f, 0x06, 0x3f,
/* :0x2e XXX: read-only */
0x00, 0x00,
0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00,
/* :0x38 */
0x1a, 0x1a, 0x13, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00,
/* :0x40 */
0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x68, 0x10, 0x97, 0x4c, 0x18,
0x9b, 0x93, 0x9f, 0xff, 0x7c, 0x34, 0x3f, 0x3f,
/* :0x50 */
0x3f, 0x83, 0x83, 0x80, 0x0d, 0x0f, 0xc3, 0x06,
0x02, 0x80, 0x0f, 0x77, 0xa7, 0x67, 0x66, 0x2e,
/* :0x60 */
0x7b, 0x02, 0x35, 0xcb, 0x8a, 0x09, 0x2a, 0x77,
0x41, 0x88, 0x41, 0x52, 0xf1, 0x10, 0x20, 0x00,
/* :0x70 */
0x41, 0xc3, 0x00, 0x3e, 0xb8, 0x02, 0x00, 0x00,
0x00, 0x00, 0x12, 0x30,
SAA712x_reg7c | 0x40, 0x00, 0xff, 0xff,
};
regs[0x7A] = FIRST_ACTIVE_LINE & 0xff;
regs[0x7B] = LAST_ACTIVE_LINE & 0xff;
regs[0x7C] = ((1 << 7) |
(((LAST_ACTIVE_LINE >> 8) & 1) << 6) |
(((FIRST_ACTIVE_LINE >> 8) & 1) << 4));
/* PAL: XXX: We could do a second set of regs to avoid this */
if (solo_dev->video_type != SOLO_VO_FMT_TYPE_NTSC) {
regs[0x28] = 0xE1;
regs[0x5A] = 0x0F;
regs[0x61] = 0x02;
regs[0x62] = 0x35;
regs[0x63] = 0xCB;
regs[0x64] = 0x8A;
regs[0x65] = 0x09;
regs[0x66] = 0x2A;
regs[0x6C] = 0xf1;
regs[0x6E] = 0x20;
regs[0x7A] = 0x06 + 12;
regs[0x7b] = 0x24 + 12;
regs[0x7c] |= 1 << 6;
}
/* First 0x25 bytes are read-only? */
for (i = 0x26; i < 128; i++) {
if (i == 0x60 || i == 0x7D)
continue;
solo_i2c_writebyte(solo_dev, SOLO_I2C_SAA, 0x46, i, regs[i]);
}
return;
if (dev->video_type == SOLO_VO_FMT_TYPE_PAL)
saa712x_write_regs(dev, saa7128_regs_pal, reg_start,
sizeof(saa7128_regs_pal));
else
saa712x_write_regs(dev, saa7128_regs_ntsc, reg_start,
sizeof(saa7128_regs_ntsc));
}
int solo_tw28_init(struct solo_dev *solo_dev)
......@@ -609,7 +629,7 @@ int solo_tw28_init(struct solo_dev *solo_dev)
return -EINVAL;
}
saa7128_setup(solo_dev);
saa712x_setup(solo_dev);
for (i = 0; i < solo_dev->tw28_cnt; i++) {
if ((solo_dev->tw2865 & (1 << i)))
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment