perf parse-events: Use strcmp() to compare the PMU name
A big uncore event group is split into multiple small groups which only include the uncore events from the same PMU. This has been supported in the commit 3cdc5c2c ("perf parse-events: Handle uncore event aliases in small groups properly"). If the event's PMU name starts to repeat, it must be a new event. That can be used to distinguish the leader from other members. But now it only compares the pointer of pmu_name (leader->pmu_name == evsel->pmu_name). If we use "perf stat -M LLC_MISSES.PCIE_WRITE -a" on cascadelakex, the event list is: evsel->name evsel->pmu_name --------------------------------------------------------------- unc_iio_data_req_of_cpu.mem_write.part0 uncore_iio_4 (as leader) unc_iio_data_req_of_cpu.mem_write.part0 uncore_iio_2 unc_iio_data_req_of_cpu.mem_write.part0 uncore_iio_0 unc_iio_data_req_of_cpu.mem_write.part0 uncore_iio_5 unc_iio_data_req_of_cpu.mem_write.part0 uncore_iio_3 unc_iio_data_req_of_cpu.mem_write.part0 uncore_iio_1 unc_iio_data_req_of_cpu.mem_write.part1 uncore_iio_4 ...... For the event "unc_iio_data_req_of_cpu.mem_write.part1" with "uncore_iio_4", it should be the event from PMU "uncore_iio_4". It's not a new leader for this PMU. But if we use "(leader->pmu_name == evsel->pmu_name)", the check would be failed and the event is stored to leaders[] as a new PMU leader. So this patch uses strcmp to compare the PMU name between events. Fixes: d4953f7e ("perf parse-events: Fix 3 use after frees found with clang ASAN") Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jin Yao <yao.jin@intel.com> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200430003618.17002-1-yao.jin@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment