Commit 8d9cbd8f authored by Vineet Gupta's avatar Vineet Gupta Committed by Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

perf evsel: Don't rely on malloc working for sz 0

When running perf on ARC (uClibc based userspace), ran into this issue
   ------------->8----------------
	[ARCLinux]$ ./perf record ls
	bin             etc             perf            sys
	debug           init            perf.data       tmp
	[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
	[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.001 MB perf.data (~24 samples) ]

	[ARCLinux]$ ./perf report
	incompatible file format (rerun with -v to learn more)
   ------------->8----------------

The problem happens in the following call stack when zalloc is called
with size zero

glibc default / uClibc with MALLOC_GLIBC_COMPAT are OK, but not if that
config option is not enabled.

  cmd_report
     perf_session__new
	perf_session__open
	    perf_session__read_header
		read_attr(fd, header, &f_attr)
		nr_ids = f_attr.ids.size / sizeof(u64); <-- 0
		perf_evsel__alloc_id(vsel, 1, nr_ids)
			zalloc(ncpus * nthreads * sizeof(u64)) <-- 0

header.c: read_attr()

(gdb) p *f_attr
$17 = {
  attr = {
    type = 0,
    size = 96,
    config = 0,
    {
      sample_period = 4000,
      sample_freq = 4000
    },
...
  ids = {
    offset = 104,
    size = 0      <------
  }
}
Signed-off-by: default avatarVineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
Suggested-by: default avatarNamhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Acked-by: default avatarJiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1421156604-30603-5-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.comSigned-off-by: default avatarArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
parent b3890e47
......@@ -797,6 +797,9 @@ int perf_evsel__enable(struct perf_evsel *evsel, int ncpus, int nthreads)
int perf_evsel__alloc_id(struct perf_evsel *evsel, int ncpus, int nthreads)
{
if (ncpus == 0 || nthreads == 0)
return 0;
if (evsel->system_wide)
nthreads = 1;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment