Commit 9202e31d authored by Alexander Duyck's avatar Alexander Duyck Committed by David S. Miller

skb: Drop bad code from pskb_expand_head

The fast-path for pskb_expand_head contains a check where the size plus the
unaligned size of skb_shared_info is compared against the size of the data
buffer.  This code path has two issues.  First is the fact that after the
recent changes by Eric Dumazet to __alloc_skb and build_skb the shared info
is always placed in the optimal spot for a buffer size making this check
unnecessary.  The second issue is the fact that the check doesn't take into
account the aligned size of shared info.  As a result the code burns cycles
doing a memcpy with nothing actually being shifted.
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
Acked-by: default avatarEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent bd14b1b2
......@@ -951,17 +951,6 @@ int pskb_expand_head(struct sk_buff *skb, int nhead, int ntail,
fastpath = atomic_read(&skb_shinfo(skb)->dataref) == delta;
}
if (fastpath && !skb->head_frag &&
size + sizeof(struct skb_shared_info) <= ksize(skb->head)) {
memmove(skb->head + size, skb_shinfo(skb),
offsetof(struct skb_shared_info,
frags[skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags]));
memmove(skb->head + nhead, skb->head,
skb_tail_pointer(skb) - skb->head);
off = nhead;
goto adjust_others;
}
data = kmalloc(size + SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info)),
gfp_mask);
if (!data)
......@@ -997,7 +986,6 @@ int pskb_expand_head(struct sk_buff *skb, int nhead, int ntail,
skb->head = data;
skb->head_frag = 0;
adjust_others:
skb->data += off;
#ifdef NET_SKBUFF_DATA_USES_OFFSET
skb->end = size;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment