Commit 99f66b51 authored by Will Deacon's avatar Will Deacon Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

arm64/vdso: Fix nsec handling for CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW

commit dbb236c1 upstream.

Recently vDSO support for CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW was added in
49eea433 ("arm64: Add support for CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW in
clock_gettime() vDSO"). Noticing that the core timekeeping code
never set tkr_raw.xtime_nsec, the vDSO implementation didn't
bother exposing it via the data page and instead took the
unshifted tk->raw_time.tv_nsec value which was then immediately
shifted left in the vDSO code.

Unfortunately, by accellerating the MONOTONIC_RAW clockid, it
uncovered potential 1ns time inconsistencies caused by the
timekeeping core not handing sub-ns resolution.

Now that the core code has been fixed and is actually setting
tkr_raw.xtime_nsec, we need to take that into account in the
vDSO by adding it to the shifted raw_time value, in order to
fix the user-visible inconsistency. Rather than do that at each
use (and expand the data page in the process), instead perform
the shift/addition operation when populating the data page and
remove the shift from the vDSO code entirely.

[jstultz: minor whitespace tweak, tried to improve commit
 message to make it more clear this fixes a regression]
Reported-by: default avatarJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Tested-by: default avatarDaniel Mentz <danielmentz@google.com>
Acked-by: default avatarKevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <stephen.boyd@linaro.org>
Cc: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1496965462-20003-4-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: default avatarThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent a53bfdda
...@@ -217,10 +217,11 @@ void update_vsyscall(struct timekeeper *tk) ...@@ -217,10 +217,11 @@ void update_vsyscall(struct timekeeper *tk)
/* tkr_mono.cycle_last == tkr_raw.cycle_last */ /* tkr_mono.cycle_last == tkr_raw.cycle_last */
vdso_data->cs_cycle_last = tk->tkr_mono.cycle_last; vdso_data->cs_cycle_last = tk->tkr_mono.cycle_last;
vdso_data->raw_time_sec = tk->raw_time.tv_sec; vdso_data->raw_time_sec = tk->raw_time.tv_sec;
vdso_data->raw_time_nsec = tk->raw_time.tv_nsec; vdso_data->raw_time_nsec = (tk->raw_time.tv_nsec <<
tk->tkr_raw.shift) +
tk->tkr_raw.xtime_nsec;
vdso_data->xtime_clock_sec = tk->xtime_sec; vdso_data->xtime_clock_sec = tk->xtime_sec;
vdso_data->xtime_clock_nsec = tk->tkr_mono.xtime_nsec; vdso_data->xtime_clock_nsec = tk->tkr_mono.xtime_nsec;
/* tkr_raw.xtime_nsec == 0 */
vdso_data->cs_mono_mult = tk->tkr_mono.mult; vdso_data->cs_mono_mult = tk->tkr_mono.mult;
vdso_data->cs_raw_mult = tk->tkr_raw.mult; vdso_data->cs_raw_mult = tk->tkr_raw.mult;
/* tkr_mono.shift == tkr_raw.shift */ /* tkr_mono.shift == tkr_raw.shift */
......
...@@ -256,7 +256,6 @@ monotonic_raw: ...@@ -256,7 +256,6 @@ monotonic_raw:
seqcnt_check fail=monotonic_raw seqcnt_check fail=monotonic_raw
/* All computations are done with left-shifted nsecs. */ /* All computations are done with left-shifted nsecs. */
lsl x14, x14, x12
get_nsec_per_sec res=x9 get_nsec_per_sec res=x9
lsl x9, x9, x12 lsl x9, x9, x12
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment