Commit 9ed50b82 authored by Gao Xiang's avatar Gao Xiang

erofs: fix incorrect symlink detection in fast symlink

Fast symlink can be used if the on-disk symlink data is stored
in the same block as the on-disk inode, so we don’t need to trigger
another I/O for symlink data.  However, currently fs correction could be
reported _incorrectly_ if inode xattrs are too large.

In fact, these should be valid images although they cannot be handled as
fast symlinks.

Many thanks to Colin for reporting this!
Reported-by: default avatarColin Walters <walters@verbum.org>
Reported-by: https://honggfuzz.dev/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/bb2dd430-7de0-47da-ae5b-82ab2dd4d945@app.fastmail.com
Fixes: 431339ba ("staging: erofs: add inode operations")
[ Note that it's a runtime misbehavior instead of a security issue. ]
Signed-off-by: default avatarGao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240909031911.1174718-1-hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com
parent da3ea350
...@@ -178,12 +178,14 @@ static int erofs_fill_symlink(struct inode *inode, void *kaddr, ...@@ -178,12 +178,14 @@ static int erofs_fill_symlink(struct inode *inode, void *kaddr,
unsigned int m_pofs) unsigned int m_pofs)
{ {
struct erofs_inode *vi = EROFS_I(inode); struct erofs_inode *vi = EROFS_I(inode);
unsigned int bsz = i_blocksize(inode); loff_t off;
char *lnk; char *lnk;
/* if it cannot be handled with fast symlink scheme */ m_pofs += vi->xattr_isize;
if (vi->datalayout != EROFS_INODE_FLAT_INLINE || /* check if it cannot be handled with fast symlink scheme */
inode->i_size >= bsz || inode->i_size < 0) { if (vi->datalayout != EROFS_INODE_FLAT_INLINE || inode->i_size < 0 ||
check_add_overflow(m_pofs, inode->i_size, &off) ||
off > i_blocksize(inode)) {
inode->i_op = &erofs_symlink_iops; inode->i_op = &erofs_symlink_iops;
return 0; return 0;
} }
...@@ -192,16 +194,6 @@ static int erofs_fill_symlink(struct inode *inode, void *kaddr, ...@@ -192,16 +194,6 @@ static int erofs_fill_symlink(struct inode *inode, void *kaddr,
if (!lnk) if (!lnk)
return -ENOMEM; return -ENOMEM;
m_pofs += vi->xattr_isize;
/* inline symlink data shouldn't cross block boundary */
if (m_pofs + inode->i_size > bsz) {
kfree(lnk);
erofs_err(inode->i_sb,
"inline data cross block boundary @ nid %llu",
vi->nid);
DBG_BUGON(1);
return -EFSCORRUPTED;
}
memcpy(lnk, kaddr + m_pofs, inode->i_size); memcpy(lnk, kaddr + m_pofs, inode->i_size);
lnk[inode->i_size] = '\0'; lnk[inode->i_size] = '\0';
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment