Commit a3e9af95 authored by Dan Williams's avatar Dan Williams

libnvdimm: restore "libnvdimm: band aid btt vs clear poison locking"

This continues the 4.11 status quo of disabling of error clearing from
the BTT I/O path. Toshi found that even though we have eliminated all
the libnvdimm sources of sleeping-while-atomic triggers, we still have
sleeping operations that will occur in the path to send the ACPI DSM to
the DIMM to clear the error:

 BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slab.h:432
 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 13353, name: dd
 Call Trace:
  dump_stack+0x86/0xc3
  ___might_sleep+0x17d/0x250
  __might_sleep+0x4a/0x80
  __kmalloc+0x1c0/0x2e0
  acpi_os_allocate_zeroed+0x2d/0x2f
  acpi_evaluate_object+0x59/0x3b1
  acpi_evaluate_dsm+0xbd/0x10c
  acpi_nfit_ctl+0x1ef/0x7c0 [nfit]
  ? nsio_rw_bytes+0x152/0x280
  nvdimm_clear_poison+0x77/0x140
  nsio_rw_bytes+0x18f/0x280
  btt_write_pg+0x1d4/0x3d0 [nd_btt]
  btt_make_request+0x119/0x2d0 [nd_btt]

A solution for tracking and handling media errors natively in the BTT is
needed.

Cc: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Cc: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Cc: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
Reported-by: default avatarToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
parent 452bae0a
......@@ -250,7 +250,16 @@ static int nsio_rw_bytes(struct nd_namespace_common *ndns,
}
if (unlikely(is_bad_pmem(&nsio->bb, sector, sz_align))) {
if (IS_ALIGNED(offset, 512) && IS_ALIGNED(size, 512)) {
/*
* FIXME: nsio_rw_bytes() may be called from atomic
* context in the btt case and the ACPI DSM path for
* clearing the error takes sleeping locks and allocates
* memory. An explicit error clearing path, and support
* for tracking badblocks in BTT metadata is needed to
* work around this collision.
*/
if (IS_ALIGNED(offset, 512) && IS_ALIGNED(size, 512)
&& (!ndns->claim || !is_nd_btt(ndns->claim))) {
long cleared;
cleared = nvdimm_clear_poison(&ndns->dev,
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment