Merge branch 'x86-rep-insns': x86 user copy clarifications
Merge my x86 user copy updates branch. This cleans up a lot of our x86 memory copy code, particularly for user accesses. I've been pushing for microarchitectural support for good memory copying and clearing for a long while, and it's been visible in how the kernel has aggressively used 'rep movs' and 'rep stos' whenever possible. And that micro-architectural support has been improving over the years, to the point where on modern CPU's the best option for a memory copy that would become a function call (as opposed to being something that can just be turned into individual 'mov' instructions) is now to inline the string instruction sequence instead. However, that only makes sense when we have the modern markers for this: the x86 FSRM and FSRS capabilities ("Fast Short REP MOVS/STOS"). So this cleans up a lot of our historical code, gets rid of the legacy marker use ("REP_GOOD" and "ERMS") from the memcpy/memset cases, and replaces it with that modern reality. Note that REP_GOOD and ERMS end up still being used by the known large cases (ie page copyin gand clearing). The reason much of this ends up being about user memory accesses is that the normal in-kernel cases are done by the compiler (__builtin_memcpy() and __builtin_memset()) and getting to the point where we can use our instruction rewriting to inline those to be string instructions will need some compiler support. In contrast, the user accessor functions are all entirely controlled by the kernel code, so we can change those arbitrarily. Thanks to Borislav Petkov for feedback on the series, and Jens testing some of this on micro-architectures I didn't personally have access to. * x86-rep-insns: x86: rewrite '__copy_user_nocache' function x86: remove 'zerorest' argument from __copy_user_nocache() x86: set FSRS automatically on AMD CPUs that have FSRM x86: improve on the non-rep 'copy_user' function x86: improve on the non-rep 'clear_user' function x86: inline the 'rep movs' in user copies for the FSRM case x86: move stac/clac from user copy routines into callers x86: don't use REP_GOOD or ERMS for user memory clearing x86: don't use REP_GOOD or ERMS for user memory copies x86: don't use REP_GOOD or ERMS for small memory clearing x86: don't use REP_GOOD or ERMS for small memory copies
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment