Commit aea369b9 authored by Oleg Nesterov's avatar Oleg Nesterov Committed by Paul E. McKenney

timers: Make internal_add_timer() update ->next_timer if ->active_timers == 0

The internal_add_timer() function updates base->next_timer only if
timer->expires < base->next_timer. This is correct, but it also makes
sense to do the same if we add the first non-deferrable timer.
Signed-off-by: default avatarOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Acked-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: default avatarMike Galbraith <bitbucket@online.de>
parent 18d8cb64
......@@ -404,9 +404,9 @@ static void internal_add_timer(struct tvec_base *base, struct timer_list *timer)
* Update base->active_timers and base->next_timer
*/
if (!tbase_get_deferrable(timer->base)) {
if (time_before(timer->expires, base->next_timer))
if (!base->active_timers++ ||
time_before(timer->expires, base->next_timer))
base->next_timer = timer->expires;
base->active_timers++;
}
base->all_timers++;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment