Commit afa4b0af authored by Filipe Manana's avatar Filipe Manana Committed by David Sterba

btrfs: don't throttle on delayed items when evicting deleted inode

During inode eviction, if we are truncating a deleted inode, we don't add
delayed items for our inode, so there's no need to throttle on delayed
items on each iteration of the loop that truncates inode items from its
subvolume tree. But we dirty extent buffers from its subvolume tree, so
we only need to throttle on btree inode dirty pages.

So use btrfs_btree_balance_dirty_nodelay() in the loop that truncates
inode items.
Reviewed-by: default avatarJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
parent a8fdc051
...@@ -5350,7 +5350,12 @@ void btrfs_evict_inode(struct inode *inode) ...@@ -5350,7 +5350,12 @@ void btrfs_evict_inode(struct inode *inode)
ret = btrfs_truncate_inode_items(trans, root, &control); ret = btrfs_truncate_inode_items(trans, root, &control);
trans->block_rsv = &fs_info->trans_block_rsv; trans->block_rsv = &fs_info->trans_block_rsv;
btrfs_end_transaction(trans); btrfs_end_transaction(trans);
btrfs_btree_balance_dirty(fs_info); /*
* We have not added new delayed items for our inode after we
* have flushed its delayed items, so no need to throttle on
* delayed items. However we have modified extent buffers.
*/
btrfs_btree_balance_dirty_nodelay(fs_info);
if (ret && ret != -ENOSPC && ret != -EAGAIN) if (ret && ret != -ENOSPC && ret != -EAGAIN)
goto free_rsv; goto free_rsv;
else if (!ret) else if (!ret)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment