Commit b12c97d4 authored by John Hurley's avatar John Hurley Committed by David S. Miller

nfp: flower: fix cb_ident duplicate in indirect block register

Previously the identifier used for indirect block callback registry and
for block rule cb registry (when done via indirect blocks) was the pointer
to the netdev we were interested in receiving updates on. This worked fine
if a single app existed that registered one callback per netdev of
interest. However, if multiple cards are in place and, in turn, multiple
apps, then each app may register the same callback with the same
identifier to both the netdev's indirect block cb list and to a block's cb
list. This can lead to EEXIST errors and/or incorrect cb deletions.

Prevent this conflict by using the app pointer as the identifier for
netdev indirect block cb registry, allowing each app to register a unique
callback per netdev. For block cb registry, the same app may register
multiple cbs to the same block if using TC shared blocks. Instead of the
app, use the pointer to the allocated cb_priv data as the identifier here.
This means that there can be a unique block callback for each app/netdev
combo.

Fixes: 3166dd07 ("nfp: flower: offload tunnel decap rules via indirect TC blocks")
Reported-by: default avatarEdward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJohn Hurley <john.hurley@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent d1675a16
...@@ -718,7 +718,7 @@ nfp_flower_setup_indr_tc_block(struct net_device *netdev, struct nfp_app *app, ...@@ -718,7 +718,7 @@ nfp_flower_setup_indr_tc_block(struct net_device *netdev, struct nfp_app *app,
err = tcf_block_cb_register(f->block, err = tcf_block_cb_register(f->block,
nfp_flower_setup_indr_block_cb, nfp_flower_setup_indr_block_cb,
netdev, cb_priv, f->extack); cb_priv, cb_priv, f->extack);
if (err) { if (err) {
list_del(&cb_priv->list); list_del(&cb_priv->list);
kfree(cb_priv); kfree(cb_priv);
...@@ -726,13 +726,15 @@ nfp_flower_setup_indr_tc_block(struct net_device *netdev, struct nfp_app *app, ...@@ -726,13 +726,15 @@ nfp_flower_setup_indr_tc_block(struct net_device *netdev, struct nfp_app *app,
return err; return err;
case TC_BLOCK_UNBIND: case TC_BLOCK_UNBIND:
tcf_block_cb_unregister(f->block,
nfp_flower_setup_indr_block_cb, netdev);
cb_priv = nfp_flower_indr_block_cb_priv_lookup(app, netdev); cb_priv = nfp_flower_indr_block_cb_priv_lookup(app, netdev);
if (cb_priv) { if (!cb_priv)
return -ENOENT;
tcf_block_cb_unregister(f->block,
nfp_flower_setup_indr_block_cb,
cb_priv);
list_del(&cb_priv->list); list_del(&cb_priv->list);
kfree(cb_priv); kfree(cb_priv);
}
return 0; return 0;
default: default:
...@@ -766,15 +768,14 @@ int nfp_flower_reg_indir_block_handler(struct nfp_app *app, ...@@ -766,15 +768,14 @@ int nfp_flower_reg_indir_block_handler(struct nfp_app *app,
if (event == NETDEV_REGISTER) { if (event == NETDEV_REGISTER) {
err = __tc_indr_block_cb_register(netdev, app, err = __tc_indr_block_cb_register(netdev, app,
nfp_flower_indr_setup_tc_cb, nfp_flower_indr_setup_tc_cb,
netdev); app);
if (err) if (err)
nfp_flower_cmsg_warn(app, nfp_flower_cmsg_warn(app,
"Indirect block reg failed - %s\n", "Indirect block reg failed - %s\n",
netdev->name); netdev->name);
} else if (event == NETDEV_UNREGISTER) { } else if (event == NETDEV_UNREGISTER) {
__tc_indr_block_cb_unregister(netdev, __tc_indr_block_cb_unregister(netdev,
nfp_flower_indr_setup_tc_cb, nfp_flower_indr_setup_tc_cb, app);
netdev);
} }
return NOTIFY_OK; return NOTIFY_OK;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment