Commit b166a20b authored by Or Cohen's avatar Or Cohen Committed by David S. Miller

net/sctp: fix race condition in sctp_destroy_sock

If sctp_destroy_sock is called without sock_net(sk)->sctp.addr_wq_lock
held and sp->do_auto_asconf is true, then an element is removed
from the auto_asconf_splist without any proper locking.

This can happen in the following functions:
1. In sctp_accept, if sctp_sock_migrate fails.
2. In inet_create or inet6_create, if there is a bpf program
   attached to BPF_CGROUP_INET_SOCK_CREATE which denies
   creation of the sctp socket.

The bug is fixed by acquiring addr_wq_lock in sctp_destroy_sock
instead of sctp_close.

This addresses CVE-2021-23133.
Reported-by: default avatarOr Cohen <orcohen@paloaltonetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarXin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Fixes: 61023658 ("bpf: Add new cgroup attach type to enable sock modifications")
Signed-off-by: default avatarOr Cohen <orcohen@paloaltonetworks.com>
Acked-by: default avatarMarcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent ca09bf7b
...@@ -1520,11 +1520,9 @@ static void sctp_close(struct sock *sk, long timeout) ...@@ -1520,11 +1520,9 @@ static void sctp_close(struct sock *sk, long timeout)
/* Supposedly, no process has access to the socket, but /* Supposedly, no process has access to the socket, but
* the net layers still may. * the net layers still may.
* Also, sctp_destroy_sock() needs to be called with addr_wq_lock
* held and that should be grabbed before socket lock.
*/ */
spin_lock_bh(&net->sctp.addr_wq_lock); local_bh_disable();
bh_lock_sock_nested(sk); bh_lock_sock(sk);
/* Hold the sock, since sk_common_release() will put sock_put() /* Hold the sock, since sk_common_release() will put sock_put()
* and we have just a little more cleanup. * and we have just a little more cleanup.
...@@ -1533,7 +1531,7 @@ static void sctp_close(struct sock *sk, long timeout) ...@@ -1533,7 +1531,7 @@ static void sctp_close(struct sock *sk, long timeout)
sk_common_release(sk); sk_common_release(sk);
bh_unlock_sock(sk); bh_unlock_sock(sk);
spin_unlock_bh(&net->sctp.addr_wq_lock); local_bh_enable();
sock_put(sk); sock_put(sk);
...@@ -4993,9 +4991,6 @@ static int sctp_init_sock(struct sock *sk) ...@@ -4993,9 +4991,6 @@ static int sctp_init_sock(struct sock *sk)
sk_sockets_allocated_inc(sk); sk_sockets_allocated_inc(sk);
sock_prot_inuse_add(net, sk->sk_prot, 1); sock_prot_inuse_add(net, sk->sk_prot, 1);
/* Nothing can fail after this block, otherwise
* sctp_destroy_sock() will be called without addr_wq_lock held
*/
if (net->sctp.default_auto_asconf) { if (net->sctp.default_auto_asconf) {
spin_lock(&sock_net(sk)->sctp.addr_wq_lock); spin_lock(&sock_net(sk)->sctp.addr_wq_lock);
list_add_tail(&sp->auto_asconf_list, list_add_tail(&sp->auto_asconf_list,
...@@ -5030,7 +5025,9 @@ static void sctp_destroy_sock(struct sock *sk) ...@@ -5030,7 +5025,9 @@ static void sctp_destroy_sock(struct sock *sk)
if (sp->do_auto_asconf) { if (sp->do_auto_asconf) {
sp->do_auto_asconf = 0; sp->do_auto_asconf = 0;
spin_lock_bh(&sock_net(sk)->sctp.addr_wq_lock);
list_del(&sp->auto_asconf_list); list_del(&sp->auto_asconf_list);
spin_unlock_bh(&sock_net(sk)->sctp.addr_wq_lock);
} }
sctp_endpoint_free(sp->ep); sctp_endpoint_free(sp->ep);
local_bh_disable(); local_bh_disable();
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment