Commit b330966f authored by Miklos Szeredi's avatar Miklos Szeredi

fuse: reject options on reconfigure via fsconfig(2)

Previous patch changed handling of remount/reconfigure to ignore all
options, including those that are unknown to the fuse kernel fs.  This was
done for backward compatibility, but this likely only affects the old
mount(2) API.

The new fsconfig(2) based reconfiguration could possibly be improved.  This
would make the new API less of a drop in replacement for the old, OTOH this
is a good chance to get rid of some weirdnesses in the old API.

Several other behaviors might make sense:

 1) unknown options are rejected, known options are ignored

 2) unknown options are rejected, known options are rejected if the value
 is changed, allowed otherwise

 3) all options are rejected

Prior to the backward compatibility fix to ignore all options all known
options were accepted (1), even if they change the value of a mount
parameter; fuse_reconfigure() does not look at the config values set by
fuse_parse_param().

To fix that we'd need to verify that the value provided is the same as set
in the initial configuration (2).  The major drawback is that this is much
more complex than just rejecting all attempts at changing options (3);
i.e. all options signify initial configuration values and don't make sense
on reconfigure.

This patch opts for (3) with the rationale that no mount options are
reconfigurable in fuse.
Signed-off-by: default avatarMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
parent e8b20a47
......@@ -477,13 +477,17 @@ static int fuse_parse_param(struct fs_context *fc, struct fs_parameter *param)
struct fuse_fs_context *ctx = fc->fs_private;
int opt;
if (fc->purpose == FS_CONTEXT_FOR_RECONFIGURE) {
/*
* Ignore options coming from mount(MS_REMOUNT) for backward
* compatibility.
*/
if (fc->purpose == FS_CONTEXT_FOR_RECONFIGURE)
if (fc->oldapi)
return 0;
return invalfc(fc, "No changes allowed in reconfigure");
}
opt = fs_parse(fc, fuse_fs_parameters, param, &result);
if (opt < 0)
return opt;
......
......@@ -2603,6 +2603,7 @@ static int do_remount(struct path *path, int ms_flags, int sb_flags,
if (IS_ERR(fc))
return PTR_ERR(fc);
fc->oldapi = true;
err = parse_monolithic_mount_data(fc, data);
if (!err) {
down_write(&sb->s_umount);
......
......@@ -109,6 +109,7 @@ struct fs_context {
enum fs_context_phase phase:8; /* The phase the context is in */
bool need_free:1; /* Need to call ops->free() */
bool global:1; /* Goes into &init_user_ns */
bool oldapi:1; /* Coming from mount(2) */
};
struct fs_context_operations {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment