Bluetooth: hci_h5: Disable the hci_suspend_notifier for btrtl devices

The hci_suspend_notifier which was introduced last year, is causing
problems for uart attached btrtl devices. These devices may loose their
firmware and their baudrate setting over a suspend/resume.

Since we don't even know the baudrate after a suspend/resume recovering
from this is tricky. The driver solves this by treating these devices
the same as USB BT HCIs which drop of the bus during suspend.

Specifically the driver:
1. Simply unconditionally turns the device fully off during
   system-suspend to save maximum power.
2. Calls device_reprobe() from a workqueue to fully re-init the device
   from scratch on system-resume (unregistering the old HCI and
   registering a new HCI).

This means that these devices do not benefit from the suspend / resume
handling work done by the hci_suspend_notifier. At best this unnecessarily
adds some time to the suspend/resume time.

But in practice this is actually causing problems:

1. These btrtl devices seem to not like the HCI_OP_WRITE_SCAN_ENABLE(
SCAN_DISABLED) request being send to them when entering the
BT_SUSPEND_CONFIGURE_WAKE state. The same request send on
BT_SUSPEND_DISCONNECT works fine, but the second one send (unnecessarily?)
from the BT_SUSPEND_CONFIGURE_WAKE transition causes the device to hang:

[  573.497754] PM: suspend entry (s2idle)
[  573.554615] Filesystems sync: 0.056 seconds
[  575.837753] Bluetooth: hci0: Timed out waiting for suspend events
[  575.837801] Bluetooth: hci0: Suspend timeout bit: 4
[  575.837925] Bluetooth: hci0: Suspend notifier action (3) failed: -110

2. The PM_POST_SUSPEND / BT_RUNNING transition races with the
driver-unbinding done by the device_reprobe() work.
If the hci_suspend_notifier wins the race it is talking to a dead
device leading to the following errors being logged:

[  598.686060] Bluetooth: hci0: Timed out waiting for suspend events
[  598.686124] Bluetooth: hci0: Suspend timeout bit: 5
[  598.686237] Bluetooth: hci0: Suspend notifier action (4) failed: -110

In both cases things still work, but the suspend-notifier is causing
these ugly errors getting logged and ut increase both the suspend- and
the resume-time by 2 seconds.

This commit avoids these problems by disabling the hci_suspend_notifier.

Cc: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
Cc: Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@gmail.com>
Cc: Abhishek Pandit-Subedi <abhishekpandit@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>

drivers/bluetooth/hci_h5.c

@@ -916,6 +916,13 @@ static int h5_btrtl_setup(struct h5 *h5)
 
 static void h5_btrtl_open(struct h5 *h5)
 {
+	/*
+	 * Since h5_btrtl_resume() does a device_reprobe() the suspend handling
+	 * done by the hci_suspend_notifier is not necessary; it actually causes
+	 * delays and a bunch of errors to get logged, so disable it.
+	 */
+	set_bit(HCI_UART_NO_SUSPEND_NOTIFIER, &h5->hu->flags);
+
 	/* Devices always start with these fixed parameters */
 	serdev_device_set_flow_control(h5->hu->serdev, false);
 	serdev_device_set_parity(h5->hu->serdev, SERDEV_PARITY_EVEN);

drivers/bluetooth/hci_serdev.c

@@ -343,6 +343,9 @@ int hci_uart_register_device(struct hci_uart *hu,
 	hdev->setup = hci_uart_setup;
 	SET_HCIDEV_DEV(hdev, &hu->serdev->dev);
 
+	if (test_bit(HCI_UART_NO_SUSPEND_NOTIFIER, &hu->flags))
+		set_bit(HCI_QUIRK_NO_SUSPEND_NOTIFIER, &hdev->quirks);
+
 	if (test_bit(HCI_UART_RAW_DEVICE, &hu->hdev_flags))
 		set_bit(HCI_QUIRK_RAW_DEVICE, &hdev->quirks);
 

drivers/bluetooth/hci_uart.h

@@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ struct hci_uart {
 #define HCI_UART_PROTO_SET		0
 #define HCI_UART_REGISTERED		1
 #define HCI_UART_PROTO_READY		2
+#define HCI_UART_NO_SUSPEND_NOTIFIER	3
 
 /* TX states  */
 #define HCI_UART_SENDING	1