Commit b78bb868 authored by Peter Zijlstra's avatar Peter Zijlstra Committed by Ingo Molnar

sched: Fix double_rq_lock() compile warning

Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
parent 0cc6d77e
...@@ -119,8 +119,6 @@ ...@@ -119,8 +119,6 @@
*/ */
#define RUNTIME_INF ((u64)~0ULL) #define RUNTIME_INF ((u64)~0ULL)
static void double_rq_lock(struct rq *rq1, struct rq *rq2);
static inline int rt_policy(int policy) static inline int rt_policy(int policy)
{ {
if (unlikely(policy == SCHED_FIFO || policy == SCHED_RR)) if (unlikely(policy == SCHED_FIFO || policy == SCHED_RR))
...@@ -1695,6 +1693,8 @@ static inline void update_shares_locked(struct rq *rq, struct sched_domain *sd) ...@@ -1695,6 +1693,8 @@ static inline void update_shares_locked(struct rq *rq, struct sched_domain *sd)
#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
static void double_rq_lock(struct rq *rq1, struct rq *rq2);
/* /*
* fair double_lock_balance: Safely acquires both rq->locks in a fair * fair double_lock_balance: Safely acquires both rq->locks in a fair
* way at the expense of forcing extra atomic operations in all * way at the expense of forcing extra atomic operations in all
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment