Commit bba6529e authored by Mika Westerberg's avatar Mika Westerberg Committed by Rafael J. Wysocki

platform/x86: intel_pmc_ipc: Do not create iTCO watchdog when WDAT table exists

ACPI WDAT table is the preferred way to use hardware watchdog over the
native iTCO_wdt. Windows only uses this table for its hardware watchdog
implementation so we should be relatively safe to trust it has been
validated by OEMs.

Prevent iTCO watchdog creation if we detect that there is an ACPI WDAT
table.
Signed-off-by: default avatarMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarGuenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
parent 1f6dbb02
...@@ -651,11 +651,15 @@ static int ipc_create_pmc_devices(void) ...@@ -651,11 +651,15 @@ static int ipc_create_pmc_devices(void)
{ {
int ret; int ret;
/* If we have ACPI based watchdog use that instead */
if (!acpi_has_watchdog()) {
ret = ipc_create_tco_device(); ret = ipc_create_tco_device();
if (ret) { if (ret) {
dev_err(ipcdev.dev, "Failed to add tco platform device\n"); dev_err(ipcdev.dev, "Failed to add tco platform device\n");
return ret; return ret;
} }
}
ret = ipc_create_punit_device(); ret = ipc_create_punit_device();
if (ret) { if (ret) {
dev_err(ipcdev.dev, "Failed to add punit platform device\n"); dev_err(ipcdev.dev, "Failed to add punit platform device\n");
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment