Commit bcedaba1 authored by Thierry Reding's avatar Thierry Reding

Merge branch 'fixes' into for-next

parents 1a695a90 33cdcee0
...@@ -457,7 +457,8 @@ int pwm_apply_state(struct pwm_device *pwm, struct pwm_state *state) ...@@ -457,7 +457,8 @@ int pwm_apply_state(struct pwm_device *pwm, struct pwm_state *state)
{ {
int err; int err;
if (!pwm) if (!pwm || !state || !state->period ||
state->duty_cycle > state->period)
return -EINVAL; return -EINVAL;
if (!memcmp(state, &pwm->state, sizeof(*state))) if (!memcmp(state, &pwm->state, sizeof(*state)))
......
...@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ static int atmel_hlcdc_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) ...@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ static int atmel_hlcdc_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
chip->chip.of_pwm_n_cells = 3; chip->chip.of_pwm_n_cells = 3;
chip->chip.can_sleep = 1; chip->chip.can_sleep = 1;
ret = pwmchip_add(&chip->chip); ret = pwmchip_add_with_polarity(&chip->chip, PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED);
if (ret) { if (ret) {
clk_disable_unprepare(hlcdc->periph_clk); clk_disable_unprepare(hlcdc->periph_clk);
return ret; return ret;
......
...@@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ static ssize_t enable_store(struct device *child, ...@@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ static ssize_t enable_store(struct device *child,
goto unlock; goto unlock;
} }
pwm_apply_state(pwm, &state); ret = pwm_apply_state(pwm, &state);
unlock: unlock:
mutex_unlock(&export->lock); mutex_unlock(&export->lock);
......
...@@ -235,6 +235,9 @@ static inline int pwm_config(struct pwm_device *pwm, int duty_ns, ...@@ -235,6 +235,9 @@ static inline int pwm_config(struct pwm_device *pwm, int duty_ns,
if (!pwm) if (!pwm)
return -EINVAL; return -EINVAL;
if (duty_ns < 0 || period_ns < 0)
return -EINVAL;
pwm_get_state(pwm, &state); pwm_get_state(pwm, &state);
if (state.duty_cycle == duty_ns && state.period == period_ns) if (state.duty_cycle == duty_ns && state.period == period_ns)
return 0; return 0;
...@@ -461,6 +464,8 @@ static inline bool pwm_can_sleep(struct pwm_device *pwm) ...@@ -461,6 +464,8 @@ static inline bool pwm_can_sleep(struct pwm_device *pwm)
static inline void pwm_apply_args(struct pwm_device *pwm) static inline void pwm_apply_args(struct pwm_device *pwm)
{ {
struct pwm_state state = { };
/* /*
* PWM users calling pwm_apply_args() expect to have a fresh config * PWM users calling pwm_apply_args() expect to have a fresh config
* where the polarity and period are set according to pwm_args info. * where the polarity and period are set according to pwm_args info.
...@@ -473,18 +478,20 @@ static inline void pwm_apply_args(struct pwm_device *pwm) ...@@ -473,18 +478,20 @@ static inline void pwm_apply_args(struct pwm_device *pwm)
* at startup (even if they are actually enabled), thus authorizing * at startup (even if they are actually enabled), thus authorizing
* polarity setting. * polarity setting.
* *
* Instead of setting ->enabled to false, we call pwm_disable() * To fulfill this requirement, we apply a new state which disables
* before pwm_set_polarity() to ensure that everything is configured * the PWM device and set the reference period and polarity config.
* as expected, and the PWM is really disabled when the user request
* it.
* *
* Note that PWM users requiring a smooth handover between the * Note that PWM users requiring a smooth handover between the
* bootloader and the kernel (like critical regulators controlled by * bootloader and the kernel (like critical regulators controlled by
* PWM devices) will have to switch to the atomic API and avoid calling * PWM devices) will have to switch to the atomic API and avoid calling
* pwm_apply_args(). * pwm_apply_args().
*/ */
pwm_disable(pwm);
pwm_set_polarity(pwm, pwm->args.polarity); state.enabled = false;
state.polarity = pwm->args.polarity;
state.period = pwm->args.period;
pwm_apply_state(pwm, &state);
} }
struct pwm_lookup { struct pwm_lookup {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment