Commit bd207330 authored by Borislav Petkov's avatar Borislav Petkov Committed by Ingo Molnar

x86/microcode/intel: Save pointer to ucode patch for early AP loading

Normally, when the initrd is gone, we can't search it for microcode
blobs to apply anymore. For that we need to stash away the patch in our
own storage.

And save_microcode_in_initrd_intel() looks like the proper place to
do that from. So in order for early loading to work, invalidate the
intel_ucode_patch pointer to the patch *before* scanning the initrd one
last time.

If the scanning code finds a microcode patch, it will assign that
pointer again, this time with our own storage's address.

This way, early microcode application during resume-from-RAM works too,
even after the initrd is long gone.
Tested-by: default avatarDominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170614140626.4462-2-bp@alien8.deSigned-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
parent a3d98c93
......@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ static struct ucode_patch *__alloc_microcode_buf(void *data, unsigned int size)
static void save_microcode_patch(void *data, unsigned int size)
{
struct microcode_header_intel *mc_hdr, *mc_saved_hdr;
struct ucode_patch *iter, *tmp, *p;
struct ucode_patch *iter, *tmp, *p = NULL;
bool prev_found = false;
unsigned int sig, pf;
......@@ -202,6 +202,18 @@ static void save_microcode_patch(void *data, unsigned int size)
else
list_add_tail(&p->plist, &microcode_cache);
}
/*
* Save for early loading. On 32-bit, that needs to be a physical
* address as the APs are running from physical addresses, before
* paging has been enabled.
*/
if (p) {
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_32))
intel_ucode_patch = (struct microcode_intel *)__pa_nodebug(p->data);
else
intel_ucode_patch = p->data;
}
}
static int microcode_sanity_check(void *mc, int print_err)
......@@ -607,6 +619,14 @@ int __init save_microcode_in_initrd_intel(void)
struct ucode_cpu_info uci;
struct cpio_data cp;
/*
* initrd is going away, clear patch ptr. We will scan the microcode one
* last time before jettisoning and save a patch, if found. Then we will
* update that pointer too, with a stable patch address to use when
* resuming the cores.
*/
intel_ucode_patch = NULL;
if (!load_builtin_intel_microcode(&cp))
cp = find_microcode_in_initrd(ucode_path, false);
......@@ -619,9 +639,6 @@ int __init save_microcode_in_initrd_intel(void)
show_saved_mc();
/* initrd is going away, clear patch ptr. */
intel_ucode_patch = NULL;
return 0;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment