Commit c01f2a5f authored by Thomas Richter's avatar Thomas Richter Committed by Vasily Gorbik

s390/cpum_cf: simplify pr_err() statement in cpumf_pmu_enable/disable

Simplify pr_err() statement into one line and omit return statement.

No functional change.
Signed-off-by: default avatarThomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: default avatarSumanth Korikkar <sumanthk@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarVasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
parent b3e0423c
......@@ -471,12 +471,9 @@ static void cpumf_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
return;
err = lcctl(cpuhw->state | cpuhw->dev_state);
if (err) {
pr_err("Enabling the performance measuring unit "
"failed with rc=%x\n", err);
return;
}
if (err)
pr_err("Enabling the performance measuring unit failed with rc=%x\n", err);
else
cpuhw->flags |= PMU_F_ENABLED;
}
......@@ -497,12 +494,9 @@ static void cpumf_pmu_disable(struct pmu *pmu)
inactive = cpuhw->state & ~((1 << CPUMF_LCCTL_ENABLE_SHIFT) - 1);
inactive |= cpuhw->dev_state;
err = lcctl(inactive);
if (err) {
pr_err("Disabling the performance measuring unit "
"failed with rc=%x\n", err);
return;
}
if (err)
pr_err("Disabling the performance measuring unit failed with rc=%x\n", err);
else
cpuhw->flags &= ~PMU_F_ENABLED;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment