drm: Try to document legacy DPMS uapi a bit better
Due to inconsistency of how various legacy drivers implemented DPMS the DPMS uabi has a lot of quirks. Atomic standardizes this, but drivers using the DPMS support can't rely on that since legacy drivers still exist. Laurent asked for this. v2: Improve commit message and explain that DPMS doesn't really exist for the atomic ioctl (it's "ACTIVE" on the CRTC instead). Text polish from Eric's review. Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> Cc: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie> Cc: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net> Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net> Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170920225957.16278-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment