Commit d1d253cf authored by Jason Gunthorpe's avatar Jason Gunthorpe Committed by Jarkko Sakkinen

tpm tis: Do not print timeout messages twice

The tis driver does a tpm_get_timeouts out side of tpm_chip_register,
and tpm_get_timeouts can print a message, resulting in two prints, eg:

 tpm tpm0: [Hardware Error]: Adjusting reported timeouts: A 10000->750000us B 10000->2000000us C 10000->750000us D 10000->750000us

Keep track and prevent tpm_get_timeouts from running a second time, and
clarify the purpose of the call in tpm_tis_core to only be connected to
irq testing.
Signed-off-by: default avatarJason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
parent 26a137e3
...@@ -501,6 +501,9 @@ int tpm_get_timeouts(struct tpm_chip *chip) ...@@ -501,6 +501,9 @@ int tpm_get_timeouts(struct tpm_chip *chip)
unsigned long old_timeout[4]; unsigned long old_timeout[4];
ssize_t rc; ssize_t rc;
if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_HAVE_TIMEOUTS)
return 0;
if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2) { if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2) {
/* Fixed timeouts for TPM2 */ /* Fixed timeouts for TPM2 */
chip->timeout_a = msecs_to_jiffies(TPM2_TIMEOUT_A); chip->timeout_a = msecs_to_jiffies(TPM2_TIMEOUT_A);
...@@ -513,6 +516,8 @@ int tpm_get_timeouts(struct tpm_chip *chip) ...@@ -513,6 +516,8 @@ int tpm_get_timeouts(struct tpm_chip *chip)
msecs_to_jiffies(TPM2_DURATION_MEDIUM); msecs_to_jiffies(TPM2_DURATION_MEDIUM);
chip->duration[TPM_LONG] = chip->duration[TPM_LONG] =
msecs_to_jiffies(TPM2_DURATION_LONG); msecs_to_jiffies(TPM2_DURATION_LONG);
chip->flags |= TPM_CHIP_FLAG_HAVE_TIMEOUTS;
return 0; return 0;
} }
...@@ -596,6 +601,8 @@ int tpm_get_timeouts(struct tpm_chip *chip) ...@@ -596,6 +601,8 @@ int tpm_get_timeouts(struct tpm_chip *chip)
chip->duration_adjusted = true; chip->duration_adjusted = true;
dev_info(&chip->dev, "Adjusting TPM timeout parameters."); dev_info(&chip->dev, "Adjusting TPM timeout parameters.");
} }
chip->flags |= TPM_CHIP_FLAG_HAVE_TIMEOUTS;
return 0; return 0;
} }
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm_get_timeouts); EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm_get_timeouts);
......
...@@ -143,6 +143,7 @@ enum tpm_chip_flags { ...@@ -143,6 +143,7 @@ enum tpm_chip_flags {
TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2 = BIT(1), TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2 = BIT(1),
TPM_CHIP_FLAG_IRQ = BIT(2), TPM_CHIP_FLAG_IRQ = BIT(2),
TPM_CHIP_FLAG_VIRTUAL = BIT(3), TPM_CHIP_FLAG_VIRTUAL = BIT(3),
TPM_CHIP_FLAG_HAVE_TIMEOUTS = BIT(4),
}; };
struct tpm_chip { struct tpm_chip {
......
...@@ -777,9 +777,13 @@ int tpm_tis_core_init(struct device *dev, struct tpm_tis_data *priv, int irq, ...@@ -777,9 +777,13 @@ int tpm_tis_core_init(struct device *dev, struct tpm_tis_data *priv, int irq,
if (intfcaps & TPM_INTF_DATA_AVAIL_INT) if (intfcaps & TPM_INTF_DATA_AVAIL_INT)
dev_dbg(dev, "\tData Avail Int Support\n"); dev_dbg(dev, "\tData Avail Int Support\n");
/* Very early on issue a command to the TPM in polling mode to make /* INTERRUPT Setup */
* sure it works. May as well use that command to set the proper init_waitqueue_head(&priv->read_queue);
* timeouts for the driver. init_waitqueue_head(&priv->int_queue);
if (irq != -1) {
/* Before doing irq testing issue a command to the TPM in polling mode
* to make sure it works. May as well use that command to set the
* proper timeouts for the driver.
*/ */
if (tpm_get_timeouts(chip)) { if (tpm_get_timeouts(chip)) {
dev_err(dev, "Could not get TPM timeouts and durations\n"); dev_err(dev, "Could not get TPM timeouts and durations\n");
...@@ -787,10 +791,6 @@ int tpm_tis_core_init(struct device *dev, struct tpm_tis_data *priv, int irq, ...@@ -787,10 +791,6 @@ int tpm_tis_core_init(struct device *dev, struct tpm_tis_data *priv, int irq,
goto out_err; goto out_err;
} }
/* INTERRUPT Setup */
init_waitqueue_head(&priv->read_queue);
init_waitqueue_head(&priv->int_queue);
if (irq != -1) {
if (irq) { if (irq) {
tpm_tis_probe_irq_single(chip, intmask, IRQF_SHARED, tpm_tis_probe_irq_single(chip, intmask, IRQF_SHARED,
irq); irq);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment