bcache: fix a livelock when we cause a huge number of cache misses

commit 2ef9ccbf upstream.

Subject :	[PATCH v2] bcache: fix a livelock in btree lock
Date :	Wed, 25 Feb 2015 20:32:09 +0800 (02/25/2015 04:32:09 AM)

This commit tries to fix a livelock in bcache.  This livelock might
happen when we causes a huge number of cache misses simultaneously.

When we get a cache miss, bcache will execute the following path.

->cached_dev_make_request()
  ->cached_dev_read()
    ->cached_lookup()
      ->bch->btree_map_keys()
        ->btree_root()  <------------------------
          ->bch_btree_map_keys_recurse()        |
            ->cache_lookup_fn()                 |
              ->cached_dev_cache_miss()         |
                ->bch_btree_insert_check_key() -|
                  [If btree->seq is not equal to seq + 1, we should return
                   EINTR and traverse btree again.]

In bch_btree_insert_check_key() function we first need to check upgrade
flag (op->lock == -1), and when this flag is true we need to release
read btree->lock and try to take write btree->lock.  During taking and
releasing this write lock, btree->seq will be monotone increased in
order to prevent other threads modify this in cache miss (see btree.h:74).
But if there are some cache misses caused by some requested, we could
meet a livelock because btree->seq is always changed by others.  Thus no
one can make progress.

This commit will try to take write btree->lock if it encounters a race
when we traverse btree.  Although it sacrifice the scalability but we
can ensure that only one can modify the btree.
Signed-off-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
Tested-by: Joshua Schmid <jschmid@suse.com>
Tested-by: Eric Wheeler <bcache@linux.ewheeler.net>
Cc: Joshua Schmid <jschmid@suse.com>
Cc: Zhu Yanhai <zhu.yanhai@gmail.com>
Cc: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@canonical.com>

drivers/md/bcache/btree.c

@@ -2150,9 +2150,11 @@ int bch_btree_insert_check_key(struct btree *b, struct btree_op *op,
 		rw_lock(true, b, b->level);
 
 		if (b->key.ptr[0] != btree_ptr ||
-		    b->seq != seq + 1)
+                   b->seq != seq + 1) {
+                       op->lock = b->level;
 			goto out;
                }
+	}
 
 	SET_KEY_PTRS(check_key, 1);
 	get_random_bytes(&check_key->ptr[0], sizeof(uint64_t));