SuperH IrDA: correct Baud rate error correction
It looks to me as if the second value of rate_err_array is intended to be a decimal 625. However, with a leading 0 it becomes an octal constant, and as such evaluates to a decimal 405. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Kaiser <nikai@nikai.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment