Commit e08f343b authored by Sebastian Andrzej Siewior's avatar Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Committed by Peter Zijlstra

locking: Remove rt_rwlock_is_contended().

rt_rwlock_is_contended() has no users. It makes no sense to use it as
rwlock_is_contended() because it is a sleeping lock on RT and
preemption is possible. It reports always != 0 if used by a writer and
even if there is a waiter then the lock might not be handed over if
the current owner has the highest priority.

Remove rt_rwlock_is_contended().
Reported-by: default avatarkernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211129174654.668506-3-bigeasy@linutronix.de
parent 9d0df377
......@@ -257,12 +257,6 @@ void __sched rt_write_unlock(rwlock_t *rwlock)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(rt_write_unlock);
int __sched rt_rwlock_is_contended(rwlock_t *rwlock)
{
return rw_base_is_contended(&rwlock->rwbase);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(rt_rwlock_is_contended);
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
void __rt_rwlock_init(rwlock_t *rwlock, const char *name,
struct lock_class_key *key)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment