Commit e5fc6611 authored by Daniel Lezcano's avatar Daniel Lezcano Committed by Ingo Molnar

sched: Fix race in idle_balance()

The scheduler main function 'schedule()' checks if there are no more tasks
on the runqueue. Then it checks if a task should be pulled in the current
runqueue in idle_balance() assuming it will go to idle otherwise.

But idle_balance() releases the rq->lock in order to look up the sched
domains and takes the lock again right after. That opens a window where
another cpu may put a task in our runqueue, so we won't go to idle but
we have filled the idle_stamp, thinking we will.

This patch closes the window by checking if the runqueue has been modified
but without pulling a task after taking the lock again, so we won't go to idle
right after in the __schedule() function.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: alex.shi@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1389949444-14821-2-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
parent b4f2ab43
...@@ -6589,6 +6589,13 @@ void idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq) ...@@ -6589,6 +6589,13 @@ void idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq)
raw_spin_lock(&this_rq->lock); raw_spin_lock(&this_rq->lock);
/*
* While browsing the domains, we released the rq lock.
* A task could have be enqueued in the meantime
*/
if (this_rq->nr_running && !pulled_task)
return;
if (pulled_task || time_after(jiffies, this_rq->next_balance)) { if (pulled_task || time_after(jiffies, this_rq->next_balance)) {
/* /*
* We are going idle. next_balance may be set based on * We are going idle. next_balance may be set based on
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment