Commit ead5c473 authored by Tejun Heo's avatar Tejun Heo

cgroup_freezer: don't use cgroup_lock_live_group()

freezer_read/write() used cgroup_lock_live_group() to synchronize
against task migration into and out of the target cgroup.
cgroup_lock_live_group() grabs the internal cgroup lock and using it
from outside cgroup core leads to complex and fragile locking
dependency issues which are difficult to resolve.

Now that freezer_can_attach() is replaced with freezer_attach() and
update_if_frozen() updated, nothing requires excluding migration
against freezer state reads and changes.

This patch removes cgroup_lock_live_group() and the matching
cgroup_unlock() usages.  The prone-to-bitrot, already outdated and
unnecessary global lock hierarchy documentation is replaced with
documentation in local scope.
Signed-off-by: default avatarTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
parent b4d18311
......@@ -84,50 +84,6 @@ static const char *freezer_state_strs[] = {
struct cgroup_subsys freezer_subsys;
/* Locks taken and their ordering
* ------------------------------
* cgroup_mutex (AKA cgroup_lock)
* freezer->lock
* css_set_lock
* task->alloc_lock (AKA task_lock)
* task->sighand->siglock
*
* cgroup code forces css_set_lock to be taken before task->alloc_lock
*
* freezer_create(), freezer_destroy():
* cgroup_mutex [ by cgroup core ]
*
* freezer_can_attach():
* cgroup_mutex (held by caller of can_attach)
*
* freezer_fork() (preserving fork() performance means can't take cgroup_mutex):
* freezer->lock
* sighand->siglock (if the cgroup is freezing)
*
* freezer_read():
* cgroup_mutex
* freezer->lock
* write_lock css_set_lock (cgroup iterator start)
* task->alloc_lock
* read_lock css_set_lock (cgroup iterator start)
*
* freezer_write() (freeze):
* cgroup_mutex
* freezer->lock
* write_lock css_set_lock (cgroup iterator start)
* task->alloc_lock
* read_lock css_set_lock (cgroup iterator start)
* sighand->siglock (fake signal delivery inside freeze_task())
*
* freezer_write() (unfreeze):
* cgroup_mutex
* freezer->lock
* write_lock css_set_lock (cgroup iterator start)
* task->alloc_lock
* read_lock css_set_lock (cgroup iterator start)
* task->alloc_lock (inside __thaw_task(), prevents race with refrigerator())
* sighand->siglock
*/
static struct cgroup_subsys_state *freezer_create(struct cgroup *cgroup)
{
struct freezer *freezer;
......@@ -151,9 +107,13 @@ static void freezer_destroy(struct cgroup *cgroup)
}
/*
* The call to cgroup_lock() in the freezer.state write method prevents
* a write to that file racing against an attach, and hence we don't need
* to worry about racing against migration.
* Tasks can be migrated into a different freezer anytime regardless of its
* current state. freezer_attach() is responsible for making new tasks
* conform to the current state.
*
* Freezer state changes and task migration are synchronized via
* @freezer->lock. freezer_attach() makes the new tasks conform to the
* current state and all following state changes can see the new tasks.
*/
static void freezer_attach(struct cgroup *new_cgrp, struct cgroup_taskset *tset)
{
......@@ -217,8 +177,8 @@ static void freezer_fork(struct task_struct *task)
* partially frozen when we exitted write. Caller must hold freezer->lock.
*
* Task states and freezer state might disagree while tasks are being
* migrated into @cgroup, so we can't verify task states against @freezer
* state here. See freezer_attach() for details.
* migrated into or out of @cgroup, so we can't verify task states against
* @freezer state here. See freezer_attach() for details.
*/
static void update_if_frozen(struct cgroup *cgroup, struct freezer *freezer)
{
......@@ -255,15 +215,11 @@ static int freezer_read(struct cgroup *cgroup, struct cftype *cft,
struct freezer *freezer;
enum freezer_state state;
if (!cgroup_lock_live_group(cgroup))
return -ENODEV;
freezer = cgroup_freezer(cgroup);
spin_lock_irq(&freezer->lock);
update_if_frozen(cgroup, freezer);
state = freezer->state;
spin_unlock_irq(&freezer->lock);
cgroup_unlock();
seq_puts(m, freezer_state_strs[state]);
seq_putc(m, '\n');
......@@ -297,6 +253,7 @@ static void freezer_change_state(struct cgroup *cgroup,
{
struct freezer *freezer = cgroup_freezer(cgroup);
/* also synchronizes against task migration, see freezer_attach() */
spin_lock_irq(&freezer->lock);
switch (goal_state) {
......@@ -332,10 +289,7 @@ static int freezer_write(struct cgroup *cgroup,
else
return -EINVAL;
if (!cgroup_lock_live_group(cgroup))
return -ENODEV;
freezer_change_state(cgroup, goal_state);
cgroup_unlock();
return 0;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment