Commit eb095c14 authored by Zhouyi Zhou's avatar Zhouyi Zhou Committed by Trond Myklebust

NFS:remove redundant call to nfs_do_access

In function nfs_permission:
1. the rcu_read_lock and rcu_read_unlock around nfs_do_access
is unnecessary because the rcu critical data structure is already
protected in subsidiary function nfs_access_get_cached_rcu. No other
data structure needs rcu_read_lock in nfs_do_access.

2. call nfs_do_access once is enough, because:
2-1. when mask has MAY_NOT_BLOCK bit
The second call to nfs_do_access will not happen.

2-2. when mask has no MAY_NOT_BLOCK bit
The second call to nfs_do_access will happen if res == -ECHILD, which
means the first nfs_do_access goes out after statement if (!may_block).
The second call to nfs_do_access will go through this procedure once
again except continue the work after if (!may_block).
But above work can be performed by only one call to nfs_do_access
without mangling the mask flag.

Tested in x86_64
Signed-off-by: default avatarZhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
parent 68e9a246
......@@ -2759,14 +2759,7 @@ int nfs_permission(struct inode *inode, int mask)
if (!NFS_PROTO(inode)->access)
goto out_notsup;
/* Always try fast lookups first */
rcu_read_lock();
res = nfs_do_access(inode, cred, mask|MAY_NOT_BLOCK);
rcu_read_unlock();
if (res == -ECHILD && !(mask & MAY_NOT_BLOCK)) {
/* Fast lookup failed, try the slow way */
res = nfs_do_access(inode, cred, mask);
}
out:
if (!res && (mask & MAY_EXEC))
res = nfs_execute_ok(inode, mask);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment