mptcp: add mibs counter for ignored incoming options

The MPTCP in kernel path manager has some constraints on incoming
addresses announce processing, so that in edge scenarios it can
end-up dropping (ignoring) some of such announces.

The above is not very limiting in practice since such scenarios are
very uncommon and MPTCP will recover due to ADD_ADDR retransmissions.

This patch adds a few MIB counters to account for such drop events
to allow easier introspection of the critical scenarios.

Fixes: f7efc777 ("mptcp: drop argument port from mptcp_pm_announce_addr")
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

net/mptcp/mib.c

@@ -35,12 +35,14 @@ static const struct snmp_mib mptcp_snmp_list[] = {
 	SNMP_MIB_ITEM("AddAddr", MPTCP_MIB_ADDADDR),
 	SNMP_MIB_ITEM("EchoAdd", MPTCP_MIB_ECHOADD),
 	SNMP_MIB_ITEM("PortAdd", MPTCP_MIB_PORTADD),
+	SNMP_MIB_ITEM("AddAddrDrop", MPTCP_MIB_ADDADDRDROP),
 	SNMP_MIB_ITEM("MPJoinPortSynRx", MPTCP_MIB_JOINPORTSYNRX),
 	SNMP_MIB_ITEM("MPJoinPortSynAckRx", MPTCP_MIB_JOINPORTSYNACKRX),
 	SNMP_MIB_ITEM("MPJoinPortAckRx", MPTCP_MIB_JOINPORTACKRX),
 	SNMP_MIB_ITEM("MismatchPortSynRx", MPTCP_MIB_MISMATCHPORTSYNRX),
 	SNMP_MIB_ITEM("MismatchPortAckRx", MPTCP_MIB_MISMATCHPORTACKRX),
 	SNMP_MIB_ITEM("RmAddr", MPTCP_MIB_RMADDR),
+	SNMP_MIB_ITEM("RmAddrDrop", MPTCP_MIB_RMADDRDROP),
 	SNMP_MIB_ITEM("RmSubflow", MPTCP_MIB_RMSUBFLOW),
 	SNMP_MIB_ITEM("MPPrioTx", MPTCP_MIB_MPPRIOTX),
 	SNMP_MIB_ITEM("MPPrioRx", MPTCP_MIB_MPPRIORX),

net/mptcp/mib.h

@@ -28,12 +28,14 @@ enum linux_mptcp_mib_field {
 	MPTCP_MIB_ADDADDR,		/* Received ADD_ADDR with echo-flag=0 */
 	MPTCP_MIB_ECHOADD,		/* Received ADD_ADDR with echo-flag=1 */
 	MPTCP_MIB_PORTADD,		/* Received ADD_ADDR with a port-number */
+	MPTCP_MIB_ADDADDRDROP,		/* Dropped incoming ADD_ADDR */
 	MPTCP_MIB_JOINPORTSYNRX,	/* Received a SYN MP_JOIN with a different port-number */
 	MPTCP_MIB_JOINPORTSYNACKRX,	/* Received a SYNACK MP_JOIN with a different port-number */
 	MPTCP_MIB_JOINPORTACKRX,	/* Received an ACK MP_JOIN with a different port-number */
 	MPTCP_MIB_MISMATCHPORTSYNRX,	/* Received a SYN MP_JOIN with a mismatched port-number */
 	MPTCP_MIB_MISMATCHPORTACKRX,	/* Received an ACK MP_JOIN with a mismatched port-number */
 	MPTCP_MIB_RMADDR,		/* Received RM_ADDR */
+	MPTCP_MIB_RMADDRDROP,		/* Dropped incoming RM_ADDR */
 	MPTCP_MIB_RMSUBFLOW,		/* Remove a subflow */
 	MPTCP_MIB_MPPRIOTX,		/* Transmit a MP_PRIO */
 	MPTCP_MIB_MPPRIORX,		/* Received a MP_PRIO */

net/mptcp/pm.c

@@ -213,6 +213,8 @@ void mptcp_pm_add_addr_received(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
 		mptcp_pm_add_addr_send_ack(msk);
 	} else if (mptcp_pm_schedule_work(msk, MPTCP_PM_ADD_ADDR_RECEIVED)) {
 		pm->remote = *addr;
+	} else {
+		__MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net((struct sock *)msk), MPTCP_MIB_ADDADDRDROP);
 	}
 
 	spin_unlock_bh(&pm->lock);
@@ -253,8 +255,10 @@ void mptcp_pm_rm_addr_received(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
 		mptcp_event_addr_removed(msk, rm_list->ids[i]);
 
 	spin_lock_bh(&pm->lock);
-	mptcp_pm_schedule_work(msk, MPTCP_PM_RM_ADDR_RECEIVED);
+	if (mptcp_pm_schedule_work(msk, MPTCP_PM_RM_ADDR_RECEIVED))
 		pm->rm_list_rx = *rm_list;
+	else
+		__MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net((struct sock *)msk), MPTCP_MIB_RMADDRDROP);
 	spin_unlock_bh(&pm->lock);
 }