Commit 1d3ba8a7 authored by Sergey Petrunya's avatar Sergey Petrunya

BUG#1000051: Query with simple join and ORDER BY takes thousands times longer when run with ICP

- Disable IndexConditionPushdown for reverse scans.
parent 02bdc608
...@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ WHERE ts BETWEEN '0000-00-00' AND '2010-00-01 00:00:00' ...@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ WHERE ts BETWEEN '0000-00-00' AND '2010-00-01 00:00:00'
ORDER BY ts DESC ORDER BY ts DESC
LIMIT 2; LIMIT 2;
id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extra id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extra
1 SIMPLE t1 range PRIMARY PRIMARY 4 NULL 4 Using index condition 1 SIMPLE t1 range PRIMARY PRIMARY 4 NULL 4 Using where
DROP TABLE t1; DROP TABLE t1;
# #
......
...@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ WHERE ts BETWEEN '0000-00-00' AND '2010-00-01 00:00:00' ...@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ WHERE ts BETWEEN '0000-00-00' AND '2010-00-01 00:00:00'
ORDER BY ts DESC ORDER BY ts DESC
LIMIT 2; LIMIT 2;
id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extra id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extra
1 SIMPLE t1 range PRIMARY PRIMARY 4 NULL 4 Using index condition 1 SIMPLE t1 range PRIMARY PRIMARY 4 NULL 4 Using where
DROP TABLE t1; DROP TABLE t1;
# #
...@@ -909,4 +909,21 @@ c NULL NULL ...@@ -909,4 +909,21 @@ c NULL NULL
c NULL NULL c NULL NULL
SET optimizer_switch=@save_optimizer_switch; SET optimizer_switch=@save_optimizer_switch;
DROP TABLE t1,t2,t3,t4; DROP TABLE t1,t2,t3,t4;
#
# BUG#1000051: Query with simple join and ORDER BY takes thousands times longer when run with ICP
#
create table t0 (a int);
insert into t0 values (0),(1),(2),(3),(4),(5),(6),(7),(8),(9);
create table t1 (a int, col int, filler char(100), key(a, col));
insert into t1 select A.a + 10*B.a +100*C.a, 1234, 'filler' from t0 A, t0 B, t0 C;
# Must not use ICP:
explain select * from t1 where a between 10 and 20 order by a, col desc;
id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extra
1 SIMPLE t1 range a a 5 NULL 11 Using index condition; Rowid-ordered scan; Using filesort
# Must not use ICP:
explain select * from t0,t1 where t1.a=t0.a and t1.col<123;
id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extra
1 SIMPLE t0 ALL NULL NULL NULL NULL 10 Using where
1 SIMPLE t1 ref a a 5 test.t0.a 1 Using index condition
drop table t0, t1;
set optimizer_switch=@myisam_icp_tmp; set optimizer_switch=@myisam_icp_tmp;
...@@ -3100,7 +3100,7 @@ ON r.a = (SELECT t2.a FROM t2 WHERE t2.c = t1.a AND t2.b <= '359899' ...@@ -3100,7 +3100,7 @@ ON r.a = (SELECT t2.a FROM t2 WHERE t2.c = t1.a AND t2.b <= '359899'
id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extra id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extra
1 PRIMARY t1 system PRIMARY NULL NULL NULL 1 1 PRIMARY t1 system PRIMARY NULL NULL NULL 1
1 PRIMARY r eq_ref PRIMARY PRIMARY 4 const 1 Using where 1 PRIMARY r eq_ref PRIMARY PRIMARY 4 const 1 Using where
2 DEPENDENT SUBQUERY t2 range b b 40 NULL 2 Using index condition 2 DEPENDENT SUBQUERY t2 range b b 40 NULL 2 Using where
SELECT sql_no_cache t1.a, r.a, r.b FROM t1 LEFT JOIN t2 r SELECT sql_no_cache t1.a, r.a, r.b FROM t1 LEFT JOIN t2 r
ON r.a = (SELECT t2.a FROM t2 WHERE t2.c = t1.a AND t2.b <= '359899' ON r.a = (SELECT t2.a FROM t2 WHERE t2.c = t1.a AND t2.b <= '359899'
ORDER BY t2.c DESC, t2.b DESC LIMIT 1) WHERE t1.a = 10; ORDER BY t2.c DESC, t2.b DESC LIMIT 1) WHERE t1.a = 10;
......
...@@ -3106,7 +3106,7 @@ ON r.a = (SELECT t2.a FROM t2 WHERE t2.c = t1.a AND t2.b <= '359899' ...@@ -3106,7 +3106,7 @@ ON r.a = (SELECT t2.a FROM t2 WHERE t2.c = t1.a AND t2.b <= '359899'
id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extra id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extra
1 PRIMARY t1 system PRIMARY NULL NULL NULL 1 1 PRIMARY t1 system PRIMARY NULL NULL NULL 1
1 PRIMARY r eq_ref PRIMARY PRIMARY 4 const 1 Using where 1 PRIMARY r eq_ref PRIMARY PRIMARY 4 const 1 Using where
2 DEPENDENT SUBQUERY t2 range b b 40 NULL 2 Using index condition 2 DEPENDENT SUBQUERY t2 range b b 40 NULL 2 Using where
SELECT sql_no_cache t1.a, r.a, r.b FROM t1 LEFT JOIN t2 r SELECT sql_no_cache t1.a, r.a, r.b FROM t1 LEFT JOIN t2 r
ON r.a = (SELECT t2.a FROM t2 WHERE t2.c = t1.a AND t2.b <= '359899' ON r.a = (SELECT t2.a FROM t2 WHERE t2.c = t1.a AND t2.b <= '359899'
ORDER BY t2.c DESC, t2.b DESC LIMIT 1) WHERE t1.a = 10; ORDER BY t2.c DESC, t2.b DESC LIMIT 1) WHERE t1.a = 10;
......
...@@ -3102,7 +3102,7 @@ ON r.a = (SELECT t2.a FROM t2 WHERE t2.c = t1.a AND t2.b <= '359899' ...@@ -3102,7 +3102,7 @@ ON r.a = (SELECT t2.a FROM t2 WHERE t2.c = t1.a AND t2.b <= '359899'
id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extra id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extra
1 PRIMARY t1 system PRIMARY NULL NULL NULL 1 1 PRIMARY t1 system PRIMARY NULL NULL NULL 1
1 PRIMARY r eq_ref PRIMARY PRIMARY 4 const 1 Using where 1 PRIMARY r eq_ref PRIMARY PRIMARY 4 const 1 Using where
2 DEPENDENT SUBQUERY t2 range b b 40 NULL 2 Using index condition 2 DEPENDENT SUBQUERY t2 range b b 40 NULL 2 Using where
SELECT sql_no_cache t1.a, r.a, r.b FROM t1 LEFT JOIN t2 r SELECT sql_no_cache t1.a, r.a, r.b FROM t1 LEFT JOIN t2 r
ON r.a = (SELECT t2.a FROM t2 WHERE t2.c = t1.a AND t2.b <= '359899' ON r.a = (SELECT t2.a FROM t2 WHERE t2.c = t1.a AND t2.b <= '359899'
ORDER BY t2.c DESC, t2.b DESC LIMIT 1) WHERE t1.a = 10; ORDER BY t2.c DESC, t2.b DESC LIMIT 1) WHERE t1.a = 10;
......
...@@ -3106,7 +3106,7 @@ ON r.a = (SELECT t2.a FROM t2 WHERE t2.c = t1.a AND t2.b <= '359899' ...@@ -3106,7 +3106,7 @@ ON r.a = (SELECT t2.a FROM t2 WHERE t2.c = t1.a AND t2.b <= '359899'
id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extra id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extra
1 PRIMARY t1 system PRIMARY NULL NULL NULL 1 1 PRIMARY t1 system PRIMARY NULL NULL NULL 1
1 PRIMARY r eq_ref PRIMARY PRIMARY 4 const 1 Using where 1 PRIMARY r eq_ref PRIMARY PRIMARY 4 const 1 Using where
2 DEPENDENT SUBQUERY t2 range b b 40 NULL 2 Using index condition 2 DEPENDENT SUBQUERY t2 range b b 40 NULL 2 Using where
SELECT sql_no_cache t1.a, r.a, r.b FROM t1 LEFT JOIN t2 r SELECT sql_no_cache t1.a, r.a, r.b FROM t1 LEFT JOIN t2 r
ON r.a = (SELECT t2.a FROM t2 WHERE t2.c = t1.a AND t2.b <= '359899' ON r.a = (SELECT t2.a FROM t2 WHERE t2.c = t1.a AND t2.b <= '359899'
ORDER BY t2.c DESC, t2.b DESC LIMIT 1) WHERE t1.a = 10; ORDER BY t2.c DESC, t2.b DESC LIMIT 1) WHERE t1.a = 10;
......
...@@ -3102,7 +3102,7 @@ ON r.a = (SELECT t2.a FROM t2 WHERE t2.c = t1.a AND t2.b <= '359899' ...@@ -3102,7 +3102,7 @@ ON r.a = (SELECT t2.a FROM t2 WHERE t2.c = t1.a AND t2.b <= '359899'
id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extra id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extra
1 PRIMARY t1 system PRIMARY NULL NULL NULL 1 1 PRIMARY t1 system PRIMARY NULL NULL NULL 1
1 PRIMARY r eq_ref PRIMARY PRIMARY 4 const 1 Using where 1 PRIMARY r eq_ref PRIMARY PRIMARY 4 const 1 Using where
2 DEPENDENT SUBQUERY t2 range b b 40 NULL 2 Using index condition 2 DEPENDENT SUBQUERY t2 range b b 40 NULL 2 Using where
SELECT sql_no_cache t1.a, r.a, r.b FROM t1 LEFT JOIN t2 r SELECT sql_no_cache t1.a, r.a, r.b FROM t1 LEFT JOIN t2 r
ON r.a = (SELECT t2.a FROM t2 WHERE t2.c = t1.a AND t2.b <= '359899' ON r.a = (SELECT t2.a FROM t2 WHERE t2.c = t1.a AND t2.b <= '359899'
ORDER BY t2.c DESC, t2.b DESC LIMIT 1) WHERE t1.a = 10; ORDER BY t2.c DESC, t2.b DESC LIMIT 1) WHERE t1.a = 10;
......
...@@ -262,5 +262,22 @@ SET optimizer_switch=@save_optimizer_switch; ...@@ -262,5 +262,22 @@ SET optimizer_switch=@save_optimizer_switch;
DROP TABLE t1,t2,t3,t4; DROP TABLE t1,t2,t3,t4;
--echo #
--echo # BUG#1000051: Query with simple join and ORDER BY takes thousands times longer when run with ICP
--echo #
create table t0 (a int);
insert into t0 values (0),(1),(2),(3),(4),(5),(6),(7),(8),(9);
create table t1 (a int, col int, filler char(100), key(a, col));
insert into t1 select A.a + 10*B.a +100*C.a, 1234, 'filler' from t0 A, t0 B, t0 C;
--echo # Must not use ICP:
explain select * from t1 where a between 10 and 20 order by a, col desc;
--echo # Must not use ICP:
explain select * from t0,t1 where t1.a=t0.a and t1.col<123;
drop table t0, t1;
set optimizer_switch=@myisam_icp_tmp; set optimizer_switch=@myisam_icp_tmp;
...@@ -18548,6 +18548,15 @@ check_reverse_order: ...@@ -18548,6 +18548,15 @@ check_reverse_order:
tab->limit= 0; tab->limit= 0;
goto use_filesort; // Reverse sort failed -> filesort goto use_filesort; // Reverse sort failed -> filesort
} }
/*
Cancel Pushed Index Condition, as it doesn't work for reverse scans.
*/
if (tab->select && tab->select->pre_idx_push_select_cond)
{
tab->set_cond(tab->select->pre_idx_push_select_cond);
tab->table->file->cancel_pushed_idx_cond();
}
select->quick= tmp; select->quick= tmp;
} }
else if (tab->type != JT_NEXT && tab->type != JT_REF_OR_NULL && else if (tab->type != JT_NEXT && tab->type != JT_REF_OR_NULL &&
...@@ -18561,6 +18570,14 @@ check_reverse_order: ...@@ -18561,6 +18570,14 @@ check_reverse_order:
*/ */
tab->read_first_record= join_read_last_key; tab->read_first_record= join_read_last_key;
tab->read_record.read_record= join_read_prev_same; tab->read_record.read_record= join_read_prev_same;
/*
Cancel Pushed Index Condition, as it doesn't work for reverse scans.
*/
if (tab->select && tab->select->pre_idx_push_select_cond)
{
tab->set_cond(tab->select->pre_idx_push_select_cond);
tab->table->file->cancel_pushed_idx_cond();
}
} }
} }
else if (select && select->quick) else if (select && select->quick)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment