Commit 77cbad4b authored by Igor Babaev's avatar Igor Babaev

Corrected the test case for bug 695304.

Added a test case for bug #695442 - a duplicate of bug 694092.
parent a2a09f06
...@@ -6122,6 +6122,38 @@ f1 f3 f3 f2 f4 ...@@ -6122,6 +6122,38 @@ f1 f3 f3 f2 f4
SET SESSION join_cache_level = DEFAULT; SET SESSION join_cache_level = DEFAULT;
SET SESSION optimizer_switch = DEFAULT; SET SESSION optimizer_switch = DEFAULT;
DROP TABLE t1,t2; DROP TABLE t1,t2;
CREATE TABLE t1 (f1 int, f2 varchar(10), KEY (f1), KEY (f2)) ;
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES
(4,'e'), (891879424,'l'), (-243400704,'ectlyqupbk'), (1851981824,'of'),
(-1495203840,'you'), (4,'no'), (-1436942336,'c'), (891420672,'DQQYO'),
(608698368,'qergldqmec'), (1,'x');
CREATE TABLE t2 (f3 varchar(64), KEY (f3));
INSERT INTO t2 VALUES
('d'), ('UALLN'), ('d'), ('z'), ('r'), ('YVAKV'), ('d'), ('TNGZK'), ('e'),
('xucupaxdyythsgiw'), ('why'), ('ttugkxucupaxdyyt'), ('l'), ('LHTKN'),
('d'), ('o'), ('v'), ('KGLCJ'), ('your');
SET SESSION optimizer_switch='index_merge_sort_intersection=off';
SET SESSION optimizer_switch = 'index_condition_pushdown=off';
EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM t1,t2
WHERE t2.f3 = t1.f2 AND t1.f1 IN (9, 0, 100) ORDER BY t1.f2 LIMIT 1;
id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extra
1 SIMPLE t1 range f1,f2 f2 13 NULL 10 Using where
1 SIMPLE t2 ref f3 f3 67 test.t1.f2 2 Using where; Using index
SELECT * FROM t1,t2
WHERE t2.f3 = t1.f2 AND t1.f1 IN (9, 0 ,100) ORDER BY t1.f2 LIMIT 1;
f1 f2 f3
SET SESSION optimizer_switch = DEFAULT;
SET SESSION optimizer_switch = 'index_condition_pushdown=on';
EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM t1,t2
WHERE t2.f3 = t1.f2 AND t1.f1 IN (9, 0 ,100) ORDER BY t1.f2 LIMIT 1;
id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extra
1 SIMPLE t1 range f1,f2 f2 13 NULL 10 Using where
1 SIMPLE t2 ref f3 f3 67 test.t1.f2 2 Using where; Using index
SELECT * FROM t1,t2
WHERE t2.f3 = t1.f2 AND t1.f1 IN (9, 0 ,100) ORDER BY t1.f2 LIMIT 1;
f1 f2 f3
SET SESSION optimizer_switch = DEFAULT;
DROP TABLE t1,t2;
# #
# Bug #694443: hash join using IS NULL the an equi-join condition # Bug #694443: hash join using IS NULL the an equi-join condition
# #
......
...@@ -99,4 +99,4 @@ index_merge=on,index_merge_union=on,index_merge_sort_union=on,index_merge_inters ...@@ -99,4 +99,4 @@ index_merge=on,index_merge_union=on,index_merge_sort_union=on,index_merge_inters
set optimizer_switch=default; set optimizer_switch=default;
select @@optimizer_switch; select @@optimizer_switch;
@@optimizer_switch @@optimizer_switch
index_merge=on,index_merge_union=on,index_merge_sort_union=on,index_merge_intersection=on,index_merge_sort_intersection=off,index_condition_pushdown=on,firstmatch=on,loosescan=on,materialization=on,semijoin=on,partial_match_rowid_merge=on,partial_match_table_scan=on,subquery_cache=on,mrr_sort_keys=on,outer_join_with_cache=off,semijoin_with_cache=off,join_cache_incremental=on,join_cache_hashed=on,join_cache_bka=on,table_elimination=on index_merge=on,index_merge_union=on,index_merge_sort_union=on,index_merge_intersection=on,index_merge_sort_intersection=off,index_condition_pushdown=on,firstmatch=on,loosescan=on,materialization=on,semijoin=on,partial_match_rowid_merge=on,partial_match_table_scan=on,subquery_cache=on,mrr_sort_keys=on,outer_join_with_cache=off,semijoin_with_cache=off,join_cache_incremental=on,join_cache_hashed=on,join_cache_bka=on
...@@ -2759,6 +2759,40 @@ SET SESSION optimizer_switch = DEFAULT; ...@@ -2759,6 +2759,40 @@ SET SESSION optimizer_switch = DEFAULT;
DROP TABLE t1,t2; DROP TABLE t1,t2;
# The same cause of the problem but no join buffer is used (see bug #695442)
CREATE TABLE t1 (f1 int, f2 varchar(10), KEY (f1), KEY (f2)) ;
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES
(4,'e'), (891879424,'l'), (-243400704,'ectlyqupbk'), (1851981824,'of'),
(-1495203840,'you'), (4,'no'), (-1436942336,'c'), (891420672,'DQQYO'),
(608698368,'qergldqmec'), (1,'x');
CREATE TABLE t2 (f3 varchar(64), KEY (f3));
INSERT INTO t2 VALUES
('d'), ('UALLN'), ('d'), ('z'), ('r'), ('YVAKV'), ('d'), ('TNGZK'), ('e'),
('xucupaxdyythsgiw'), ('why'), ('ttugkxucupaxdyyt'), ('l'), ('LHTKN'),
('d'), ('o'), ('v'), ('KGLCJ'), ('your');
SET SESSION optimizer_switch='index_merge_sort_intersection=off';
SET SESSION optimizer_switch = 'index_condition_pushdown=off';
EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM t1,t2
WHERE t2.f3 = t1.f2 AND t1.f1 IN (9, 0, 100) ORDER BY t1.f2 LIMIT 1;
SELECT * FROM t1,t2
WHERE t2.f3 = t1.f2 AND t1.f1 IN (9, 0 ,100) ORDER BY t1.f2 LIMIT 1;
SET SESSION optimizer_switch = DEFAULT;
SET SESSION optimizer_switch = 'index_condition_pushdown=on';
EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM t1,t2
WHERE t2.f3 = t1.f2 AND t1.f1 IN (9, 0 ,100) ORDER BY t1.f2 LIMIT 1;
SELECT * FROM t1,t2
WHERE t2.f3 = t1.f2 AND t1.f1 IN (9, 0 ,100) ORDER BY t1.f2 LIMIT 1;
SET SESSION optimizer_switch = DEFAULT;
DROP TABLE t1,t2;
--echo # --echo #
--echo # Bug #694443: hash join using IS NULL the an equi-join condition --echo # Bug #694443: hash join using IS NULL the an equi-join condition
--echo # --echo #
......
...@@ -113,4 +113,6 @@ set optimizer_switch=default; ...@@ -113,4 +113,6 @@ set optimizer_switch=default;
# #
# Bug #695304: invalid default setting for optimizer_switch # Bug #695304: invalid default setting for optimizer_switch
# #
--replace_regex /,table_elimination=on//
select @@optimizer_switch; select @@optimizer_switch;
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment