Fix for a bug with ROW(..) <=> ROW(...)

parent d6923a6c
......@@ -159,3 +159,9 @@ a MAX(b) (1, MAX(b)) = (1, 4)
1 4 1
10 43 0
drop table t1;
SELECT ROW(2,10) <=> ROW(3,4);
ROW(2,10) <=> ROW(3,4)
0
SELECT ROW(NULL,10) <=> ROW(3,NULL);
ROW(NULL,10) <=> ROW(3,NULL)
0
......@@ -79,3 +79,5 @@ insert into t1 values (10, 43);
insert into t1 values (1, 4);
select a, MAX(b), (1, MAX(b)) = (1, 4) from t1 group by a;
drop table t1;
SELECT ROW(2,10) <=> ROW(3,4);
SELECT ROW(NULL,10) <=> ROW(3,NULL);
......@@ -266,8 +266,8 @@ int Arg_comparator::compare_e_row()
uint n= (*a)->cols();
for (uint i= 0; i<n; i++)
{
if ((res= comparators[i].compare()))
return 1;
if ((res= !comparators[i].compare()))
return 0;
}
return 1;
}
......@@ -352,7 +352,6 @@ void Item_func_equal::fix_length_and_dec()
{
Item_bool_func2::fix_length_and_dec();
maybe_null=null_value=0;
set_cmp_func();
}
longlong Item_func_equal::val_int()
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment