Bug #39069: <row constructor> IN <table-subquery> seriously
messed up "ROW(...) IN (SELECT ... FROM DUAL)" always returned TRUE. Item_in_subselect::row_value_transformer rewrites "ROW(...) IN SELECT" conditions into the "EXISTS (SELECT ... HAVING ...)" form. For a subquery from the DUAL pseudotable resulting HAVING condition is an expression on constant values, so further transformation with optimize_cond() eliminates this HAVING condition and resets JOIN::having to NULL. Then JOIN::exec treated that NULL as an always-true-HAVING and that caused a bug. To distinguish an optimized out "HAVING TRUE" clause from "HAVING FALSE" we already have the JOIN::having_value flag. However, JOIN::exec() ignored JOIN::having_value as described above as if it always set to COND_TRUE. The JOIN::exec method has been modified to take into account the value of the JOIN::having_value field.
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment