1. 05 Oct, 2013 5 commits
  2. 04 Oct, 2013 2 commits
  3. 01 Oct, 2013 1 commit
    • Sergey Petrunya's avatar
      EXPLAIN UPDATE/DELETE · 6519ca51
      Sergey Petrunya authored
      - Make EXPLAIN UPDATE/DELETE work inside SPs
      - Return correct error code from mysql_delete()
      - EXPLAIN <multi-DELETE> will create a multi_delete object (as it 
        affects the optimization). select_result will be only used for 
        producing EXPLAIN output.
      6519ca51
  4. 26 Sep, 2013 2 commits
  5. 25 Sep, 2013 5 commits
  6. 23 Sep, 2013 1 commit
  7. 20 Sep, 2013 1 commit
  8. 19 Sep, 2013 1 commit
  9. 17 Sep, 2013 2 commits
  10. 04 Sep, 2013 1 commit
  11. 26 Aug, 2013 1 commit
  12. 24 Aug, 2013 1 commit
  13. 23 Aug, 2013 3 commits
  14. 22 Aug, 2013 2 commits
  15. 21 Aug, 2013 2 commits
  16. 20 Aug, 2013 4 commits
  17. 19 Aug, 2013 1 commit
    • unknown's avatar
      · dafa4582
      unknown authored
      mysql-test/r/func_set.result:
        merge
      dafa4582
  18. 18 Aug, 2013 1 commit
    • Igor Babaev's avatar
      Fixed bug mdev-4918. · 7c85205d
      Igor Babaev authored
      The function SELECT_LEX::mark_const_derived() must take into account that
      in DELETE ... RETURNING join == NULL.
      7c85205d
  19. 16 Aug, 2013 1 commit
    • unknown's avatar
      MDEV-4820: Empty master does not give error for slave GTID position that does... · f0deff86
      unknown authored
      MDEV-4820: Empty master does not give error for slave GTID position that does not exist in the binlog
      
      The main bug here was the following situation:
      
      Suppose we set up a completely new master2 as an extra multi-master to an
      existing slave that already has a different master1 for domain_id=0. When the
      slave tries to connect to master2, master2 will not have anything that slave
      requests in domain_id=0, but that is fine as master2 is supposedly meant to
      serve eg. domain_id=1. (This is MDEV-4485).
      
      But suppose that master2 then actually starts sending events from
      domain_id=0. In this case, the fix for MDEV-4485 was incomplete, and the code
      would fail to give the error that the position requested by the slave in
      domain_id=0 was missing from the binlogs of master2. This could lead to lost
      events or completely wrong replication.
      
      The patch for this bug fixes this issue.
      
      In addition, it cleans up the code a bit, getting rid of the fake_gtid_hash in
      the code. And the error message when slave and master have diverged due to
      alternate future is clarified, as requested in the bug description.
      
      f0deff86
  20. 12 Aug, 2013 2 commits
  21. 08 Aug, 2013 1 commit